Original Case: 3:13-cv-03826

Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
Case #: 0:16-cv-15595
Typecivil / private
Nature of Suit190 Contract - Other Contract
Case Filed:Apr 05, 2016
Terminated:Sep 25, 2018
Last checked: Thursday Sep 27, 2018 1:33 AM PDT
Amicus Curiae - Pending
ARCHIE OVERTON
Represented By
Archie Overton
contact info
Defendant - Appellant
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Represented By
Joshua S. Lipshutz
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
contact info
Theodore J. Boutrous Jr.
Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP
contact info
Theane Evangelis Kapur
Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP
contact info
Plaintiff - Appellee
DOUGLAS O'CONNOR
Represented By
Matthew David Carlson
Carlson Legal Services
contact info
Shannon Liss-Riordan
Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C.
contact info
Adelaide Pagano
Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C.
contact info
Plaintiff - Appellee
THOMAS COLOPY
Represented By
Matthew David Carlson
Carlson Legal Services
contact info
Shannon Liss-Riordan
Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C.
contact info
Adelaide Pagano
Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C.
contact info
Plaintiff - Appellee
MATTHEW MANAHAN
Represented By
Matthew David Carlson
Carlson Legal Services
contact info
Shannon Liss-Riordan
Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C.
contact info
Adelaide Pagano
Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C.
contact info
Plaintiff - Appellee
ELIE GURFINKEL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Represented By
Matthew David Carlson
Carlson Legal Services
contact info
Shannon Liss-Riordan
Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C.
contact info
Adelaide Pagano
Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C.
contact info

GPO Sep 25 2018
FILED OPINION (RICHARD C. TALLMAN, RICHARD R. CLIFTON and SANDRA S. IKUTA) REVERSED AND REMANDED. , Judge: RRC Authoring. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [11023736] [14-16078, 15-17420, 15-17422, 15-17475, 15-17532, 16-15000, 15-17533, 16-15035, 15-17534, 16-15001, 16-15595]
Docket last updated: 09/27/2018 1:31 AM PDT
Tuesday, April 05, 2016
1 1 Filed order (WILLIAM C. CANBY, EDWARD LEAVY and SANDRA S. IKUTA) in case no. 15-80220 on 4 5-2016 Petitioner’s motion for leave to file a reply in support of the petition is granted. The court has considered petitioner’s January 12, 2016 reply. The court, in its discretion, grants the petition for permission to appeal the district court’s December 9, 2015 order granting class action certification. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f); Chamberlan v. Ford Motor Co., 402 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 2005) (per curiam). [9927810] (RT) [Entered: 04/05/2016 12:24 PM]
Related: [-]
2 2 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Fee due from Appellant Uber Technologies, Inc. on 04/05/2016. Mediation Questionnaire due on 04/12/2016. Transcript ordered by 05/05/2016. Transcript due 06/06/2016. Appellant Uber Technologies, Inc. opening brief due 07/14/2016. Appellees Thomas Colopy, Elie Gurfinkel, Matthew Manahan and Douglas O'Connor answering brief due 08/15/2016. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [9927816] (RT) [Entered: 04/05/2016 12:26 PM]
Related: [-]