Josef Maatuk v. Emerson Electric, Inc. et al
| Ohio Northern District Court | |
| Judge: | Thomas M Parker |
| Referred: | Thomas M Parker |
| Case #: | 1:16-cv-03023 |
| Nature of Suit | 830 Property Rights - Patent |
| Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement |
| Case Filed: | Dec 19, 2016 |
| Terminated: | Feb 04, 2019 |
| Last checked: Saturday Jun 17, 2017 6:09 AM EDT |
|
Defendant
Does
|
|
|
Defendant
Therm-O-Disc
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
Josef Maatuk
1607 South Sherbourne Drive
Los Angeles, CA 90035 |
|
| TERMINATED PARTIES | |
|
Defendant
Emerson Electric, Inc.
Terminated: 12/15/2016
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Prasad Khadkikar
Terminated: 12/15/2016
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Bernd Zimmerman
Terminated: 12/15/2016
|
Represented By
|
GPO
Nov 14 2017
Report and Recommendation that Defendant's request for summary judgment on the First Cause of Action be DENIED. However, I recommend that Defendant's motion for summary judgment on the Second Cause of Action be GRANTED. To the extent Plaintiff's Third Cause of Action is a claim for unjust enrichment damages under § 1333.63 of the Ohio Uniform Trade Secrets Act, summary judgment should be GRANTED. Finally, and in the alternative, I recommend that Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings on the Third Cause of Action, to the extent it asserts a common law unjust enrichment claim, should be GRANTED. Objections to Report & Recommendation due by 11/28/2017. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 11/14/2017. (Related document 47, 48) (O,K) |
|
|
GPO
Jan 24 2018
Order Adopting Report and Recommendation 66 in its entirety. Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and there is no basis upon which to issudgment is GRANTED as to Counts Two and Three; Defendant Therm-O-Disc's 48 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED. Judge Donald C. Nugent on 1/24/2018. (P,WL)e a certificate of appealability. Therefore, the Report and Recommendation 66, is ADOPTED as follows: Defendant Therm-O-Disc's 47 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as to Count One; Defendant Therm-O-Disc's 47 Motion for Summary Ju |
|
|
GPO
Jul 10 2018
Order denying Defendant's Motion to compel discovery (Related Doc # 75). A Telephone Status Conference has been set for 7/25/2018 at 02:00 PM in Chambers 11B before Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. Call-in instructions will be sent separately. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 7/10/2018. (D,JJ) |
|
|
GPO
Aug 09 2018
Order denying Plaintiff's 84 Motion for reconsideration. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 8/9/2018. (D,JJ) |
|
|
GPO
Feb 04 2019
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Defendant Therm-O-Disc's 87 Motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 2/4/2019. (D,JJ) |
|
|
GPO
Feb 13 2019
Memorandum of Opinion and Order denying Plaintiff's 93 Application (Motion) for permission to file a reply of plaintiff to the reply memorandum of defendant's motion for summary judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 2/13/2019. (D,JJ) |
| Docket last updated: 04/17/2024 11:59 PM EDT |
| Wednesday, October 30, 2019 | ||
| 100 | 100
appeal
USCA Mandate
Wed 10/30 4:31 PM
True copy of mandate from the USCA for the Federal Circuit: Affirming the District Court's judgment re95 Notice of Appeal (USCA# 19-1615 . Date issued as mandate 10/28/19, Costs: $228.08 taxed against the appellant Josef Maatuk (H,SP) |
|