SLUDER v. JONES et al
| Florida Northern District Court | |
| Judge: | Robert L Hinkle |
| Referred: | Michael J Frank |
| Case #: | 4:18-cv-00284 |
| Nature of Suit | 555 Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus - Prison Condition |
| Cause | 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Case Filed: | Jun 13, 2018 |
| Terminated: | Sep 20, 2021 |
Defendant
GERALD AMATUCCI
|
|
Defendant
JULIE JONES
|
|
Defendant
M ROHANA
|
|
Defendant
MARK S INCH
|
|
Defendant
RHONDA DAVIS
|
|
Defendant
T POYNTER
|
|
Notice Only Party
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
|
|
Plaintiff
ROBERT J SLUDER
|
GPO
May 13 2019
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 18 MOTION for Default Judgment. Based on the foregoing, the undersigned respectfully RECOMMENDS that: Plaintiffs "Motion for default Judgment" (Doc. 18) be DENIED. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 5/13/2019. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 6/10/2019. (jcw) |
|
|
GPO
Jun 12 2019
ORDER DENYING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT. The report and recommendation 24 is accepted and adopted as the court's opinion. The motion for default judgment, ECF No. 18, is denied. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 6/12/19. (blb) |
|
|
GPO
Jul 17 2020
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 48 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM. For the reasons set forth above, the undersigned respectfully RECOMMENDS that Defendant Dr. Gerald Amatucci's motion to dismiss (Doc.48) be DENIED. (Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 8/14/2020.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 7/17/2020. (jcw) |
|
|
GPO
Aug 18 2020
ORDER DENYING THE MOTION TO DISMISS. This case is before the court on the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, ECF No. 109. No objections have been filed. Upon consideration, IT IS ORDERED: The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as the court's opinion. The defendant Dr. Gerald Amatucci's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 48, is denied. The case is remanded to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 8/18/20. (blb) |
|
|
GPO
Oct 01 2020
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 68 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM. For the reasons set forth above, the undersigned respectfullyRECOMMENDS that Defendant Dr. Rohana's motion to dismiss (Doc. 68) beDENIED. (Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 10/29/2020.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 10/1/2020. (jcw) |
|
|
GPO
Nov 02 2020
2/20. (blb)ORDER DENYING THE MOTION TO DISMISS. This case is before the court on the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, ECF No. 155. No objections have been filed. Upon consideration, IT IS ORDERED: The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as the court's opinion. The defendant Dr. M. Rohana's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 68, is denied. The case is remanded to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 11/ |
|
|
GPO
Jun 08 2021
ORDER DISMISSING THE CLAIMS AGAINST MR. POYNTER AND MS. DAVIS BUT DENYING SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO DRS. AMATUCCI AND ROHANA. The 188 & 189 reports and recommendations are accepted. The claims against the defendant T. Poynter in his individual capacity are dismissed on the merits. The claims against Mr. Poynter in his official capacity are dismissed as duplicative. See Busby v. City of Orlando, 931 F.2d 764, 776 (11th Cir. 1991) (approving the dismissal of official-capacity defendants whose presence was merely redundant to the naming of an institutional defendant). The summary-judgment motion, ECF No. 139, is granted in part and denied in part. Summary judgment is granted in favor of the defendant Rhonda Davis but denied as to the defendants Gerald Amatucci and M. Rohana. I do not direct the entry of judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). The case is remanded to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 06/08/2021. (rcb) |
| Docket last updated: 05/30/2023 11:59 PM EDT |
| Wednesday, October 06, 2021 | ||
| 253 | 253
2
pgs
order
Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
Wed 10/06 2:27 PM
ORDER ACCEPTING THE PLAINTIFF'S SUMMARY-JUDGMENT RESPONSE AS TIMELY AND ADHERING TO THE PRIOR RULING.Mr. Sluder's motion, ECF No. 252 , to accept as timely his response to Dr. Rohana and Dr. Amatuccis summary-judgment motion, ECF No. 208 -1, is granted. The response to the summary-judgment motion, as attached to the motion to accept the response as timely, is deemed part of the summary-judgment record, to the same extent as if the response had been received and filed by the clerk of court on September 10, 2021. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 10/06/2021. (rcb) |
|
| Monday, October 04, 2021 | ||
| 252 | 252
motion
Miscellaneous Relief
Tue 10/05 7:58 AM
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ACCEPT AS TIMELY FILED by ROBERT J SLUDER. (rcb) |
|