Faculty, Alumni, and Students Opposed to Racial Preferences v. Harvard Law Review et al
| Massachusetts District Court | |
| Judge: | Leo T Sorokin |
| Case #: | 1:18-cv-12105 |
| Nature of Suit | 448 Civil Rights - Education |
| Cause | 28:1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
| Case Filed: | Oct 06, 2018 |
| Terminated: | Sep 13, 2019 |
| Last checked: Thursday Apr 04, 2019 5:28 AM EDT |
|
Defendant
Betsy DeVos
in her official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Education 400 Maryland Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20202 |
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Harvard Law Review
Gannett House 1511 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138 |
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
President and Fellows of Harvard College
1350 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138 |
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
|
|
Plaintiff
Faculty, Alumni, and Students Opposed to Racial Preferences
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
Coalition for Meritocracy at Universities
|
Represented By
|
| TERMINATED PARTIES | |
|
Defendant
Harvard Law School
Terminated: 02/05/2019
1563 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138 |
Represented By
|
GPO
Aug 08 2019
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered.Because the plaintiffs have not alleged facts sufficient to establish associational standing or to plausibly state claims under Title VI, Title IX, or Ex parte Young, the defendants' motions to dismiss (Doc. Nos. 42, 44, and 46) are ALLOWED. The Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 33) is DISMISSED without prejudice.If the plaintiffs wish to file a second amended complaint remedying the deficiencies identified herein, they must seek leave to do so within thirty days of this Order. The plaintiffs shall attach a copy of their proposed second amended complaint to any such motion.If the plaintiffs move to amend their complaint, the defendants shall have thirty days to oppose the motion, with any reply by the plaintiffs due fourteen days after any oppositions are filed, and any surreplies by the defendants due fourteen days after the reply is filed. No further leave is required for the listed submissions. The reply and any surreplies shall be limited to five pages in length. In their briefs, the parties may address issues raised by the request for leave to amend as well as issues that might arise under Rule 12, so that the resolution of the motion for leave to amend will determine whether the proposed amended pleading provides a basis upon which to proceed with the lawsuit.(Motion seeking leave to file amended complaint due by 9/9/2019) (Montes, Mariliz) |
| Docket last updated: 6 hours ago |
| Friday, September 13, 2019 | ||
| 66 | 66
1
pgs
order
Order Dismissing Case
Fri 09/13 2:01 PM
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. CLOSING ORDER DISMISSING CASE.(Montes, Mariliz) |
|