Ohio Northern District Court
Judge:J Philip Calabrese
Case #: 1:19-cv-01798
Nature of Suit440 Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights
Cause42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Case Filed:Aug 07, 2019
Terminated:Dec 27, 2022
Last checked: Monday Feb 03, 2020 4:01 AM EST
Defendant
Doug Hollis
Ashtabula, OH 44004
Represented By
John T. McLandrich
Mazanec, Raskin & Ryder - Solon
contact info
Terence L. Williams
Mazanec, Raskin & Ryder - Solon
contact info
Christina M. Nicholas
Mazanec, Raskin & Ryder - Cleveland
contact info
Defendant
Nicholas A Iarocci
Jefferson, OH 44047
Represented By
Timothy T. Reid
Mansour Gavin
contact info
Kenneth E. Smith
Mansour Gavin
contact info
Defendant
Michael Palinkas
Ashtabula, OH 44004
Represented By
John T. McLandrich
Mazanec, Raskin & Ryder - Solon
contact info
Terence L. Williams
Mazanec, Raskin & Ryder - Solon
contact info
Christina M. Nicholas
Mazanec, Raskin & Ryder - Cleveland
contact info
Defendant
Joseph Celleti
Ashtabula, OH 44004
Represented By
John T. McLandrich
Mazanec, Raskin & Ryder - Solon
contact info
Terence L. Williams
Mazanec, Raskin & Ryder - Solon
contact info
Christina M. Nicholas
Mazanec, Raskin & Ryder - Cleveland
contact info
Defendant
William Felt
Ashtabula, OH 44004
Represented By
John T. McLandrich
Mazanec, Raskin & Ryder - Solon
contact info
Terence L. Williams
Mazanec, Raskin & Ryder - Solon
contact info
Christina M. Nicholas
Mazanec, Raskin & Ryder - Cleveland
contact info
Plaintiff
John Artuso
812 Huron Road E. Suite 490
Cleveland, OH 44115
Represented By
Joseph F. Scott
Scott & Winters
contact info
Kevin M. McDermott, II
Scott & Winters
contact info
Ryan A. Winters
Scott & Winters
contact info

GPO Dec 27 2022
1]) and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the remaining State-law claims. Further, the Court directs the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. Judge J. Philip Calabrese on 12/27/2022. (Y,A)Opinion and Order: The Court construes Plaintiff's motion to strike (ECF No. 91) as an objection, which it sustains. The Court construes Defendants' motion to strike the grand jury transcript (ECF No. 93) as an objection, which it overrules. The Court grants in part and denies in part the motion to exclude certain opinions and testimony of Plaintiff's expert (ECF No. 94). The Court GRANTS Defendants' motion for summary on Claims One and Two (ECF No. [8

Docket last updated: 9 hours ago
Monday, March 04, 2024
106 106 appeal USCA Mandate Mon 03/04 9:27 AM
True copy of mandate from the USCA for the Sixth Circuit: Affirming the District Court's judgment re104 Notice of Appeal (USCA# 23-3035 . Date issued as mandate 3/1/24. Costs: None (H,SP)
Related: [-]