New York Eastern District Court
Judge:Hector Gonzalez
Case #: 1:21-cv-03703
Nature of Suit365 Torts - Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause28:1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Case Filed:Jun 30, 2021
Terminated:Feb 07, 2023
Last checked: Monday Dec 27, 2021 3:42 AM EST
Counter Claimant
KARZINKA US, INC.
Represented By
Thomas M. Evans
Congdon, Flaherty, O'Callaghan, Reid, Donlon, Travis An
contact info
David F. Kluepfel
Cascone & Kluepfel, LLP
contact info
Counter Defendant
Pro-Cut
Represented By
Carmen Maria Vasquez
contact info
Counter Defendant
Prokraft Inc.
Represented By
Carmen Maria Vasquez
contact info
Defendant
Pro-Cut
Represented By
Carmen Maria Vasquez
contact info
Defendant
Prokraft Inc.
Represented By
Carmen Maria Vasquez
contact info
Plaintiff
Isojon Khusenov
Represented By
Gil Zohar
Law Offices Of Alexander Bespechny
contact info
Yuriy Prakhin
Law Offices Of Yuriy Prakhin, P.C.
contact info
Anna Collette Broxmeyer
Law Office Of Yuriy Prakhin
contact info
ThirdParty Defendant
KARZINKA US, INC.
64-46 108th Street
Forest Hills, NY 11375
Represented By
Thomas M. Evans
Congdon, Flaherty, O'Callaghan, Reid, Donlon, Travis An
contact info
David F. Kluepfel
Cascone & Kluepfel, LLP
contact info
ThirdParty Plaintiff
Prokraft Inc.
Represented By
Carmen Maria Vasquez
contact info

GPO Feb 06 2023
ORDER granting 34 35 Motions for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, the Court grants Defendants' and Third-Party Defendant's motions for summary judgment and dismissal of Plaintiff's complaint. The Court further: (i) denies the parties' motions to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Foley and Mr. Pfreundschuh, except to the extent that Dr. Foley is opining on the foreseeability of the removal of the Meat Grinder's safety guard and Mr. Pfreundschuh is opining on the likelihood that the Third-Party Defendant employees themselves would bypass an interlock safety feature, and (ii) finds Defendants' motion for summary judgment on their common law indemnity claim to be moot in light of the dismissal of Plaintiff's complaint. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment and close this case. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 2/6/2023. (JN)

Docket last updated: 04/23/2024 11:59 PM EDT
Wednesday, March 27, 2024
63 63 appeal USCA Mandate Wed 03/27 11:54 AM
MANDATE of USCA as to61 Notice of Cross Appeal filed by Pro-Cut, Prokraft Inc. For the reasons set forth above, we conclude that Khusenovs claims were properly dismissed on summary judgment. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the District Courts Judgment. Issued as Mandate: 3/27/2024. USCA# 23-320. (VJ)
Related: [-]