Wolkowitz v. Fidelity Mortgage Lenders, Inc. et al
Adversary Proceeding
Lead BK case is: 2:15-bk-16749
Lead BK case is: 2:15-bk-16749
| California Central Bankruptcy Court | |
| Chapter 7 | |
| Judge: | Sandra R Klein |
| Case #: | 2:16-ap-01431 |
| Nature of Suit | 21 Bankruptcy - Validity, priority or extent of lien or other interest in property 91 Bankruptcy - Declaratory judgment 13 Bankruptcy - Recovery of money/property - §548 fraudulent transfer |
| Case Filed: | Sep 23, 2016 |
| Terminated: | Jan 28, 2019 |
| Last checked: Sunday Jan 15, 2023 4:46 AM PST |
|
Defendant
Fidelity Mortgage Lenders, Inc.
Early Sullivan Wright Gizer & Mcrae LLP 6420 Wilshire Blvd., 17th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90048 |
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
H.B.T.D Fund 1 LLC
Early Sullivan Wright Gizer & Mcrae LLP 6420 Wilshire Blvd., 17th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90048 |
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Jack William Purcell and Cheryl E. Purcell, Trustees of the Parcel Family Trust dated July 22, 1992
|
Represented By
Jack William Purcell and Cheryl E. Purcell, Trustees of the Parcel Family Trust dated July 22, 1992
contact info |
|
Defendant
Polycomp Trust Company Custodian FBO David L. Swartz, IRA
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Howard Banchik or Steven Fogel, Trustees of Westwood Financial Corporation Profit Sharing Plan
|
Represented By
Howard Banchik or Steven Fogel, Trustees of Westwood Financial Corporation Profit Sharing Plan
contact info |
|
Defendant
Polycomp Trust Company Custodian FBO Marcie Polier Swartz, IRA
|
Represented By
|
|
Interested Party
Courtesy NEF
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor-Plaintiff
DiaDan Holdings, Ltd.
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
Edward M. Wolkowitz
10250 Constellation Blvd. Ste. 1700
Los Angeles, CA 90067 |
Represented By
|
|
U.S. Trustee
United States Trustee (LA)
915 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1850
Los Angeles, CA 90017 |
| Docket last updated: 05/09/2025 1:05 PM PDT |
| Monday, January 28, 2019 | ||
| 133 | 133
court
Close Adversary Case
Mon 01/28 3:07 PM
Adversary Case 2:16-ap-1431 Closed. The complaint filed in the above case has been disposed of and is no longer pending due to the dismissal of the complaint or main case, the entry of a judgment or the transfer of the adversary proceeding to another division or district. Since it appears that no further matters are pending that require this adversary proceeding remain open, it is ordered that this adversary proceeding is closed. (May, Thais D.) |
|