New York Southern District Court
Judge:Paul A Engelmayer
Case #: 1:17-cv-00935
Nature of Suit442 Civil Rights - Employment
Cause28:1441nr Notice of Removal
Case Filed:Feb 08, 2017
Terminated:Oct 29, 2018
Last checked: Monday Aug 07, 2017 5:26 AM EDT
Defendant
Superintendent Carron Staple
Represented By
John Corbin Carter
New York City Law Department
contact info
Plaintiff
Shadia Alvarez
Represented By
Stewart Lee Karlin
Stewart Lee Karlin, Attorney-At-Law
contact info
TERMINATED PARTIES
Defendant
Department of Education of the City of New York
Terminated: 06/20/2017
Represented By
John Corbin Carter
New York City Law Department
contact info


Docket last updated: 1 hours ago
Monday, October 29, 2018
76 76 order Judgment - Clerk Mon 10/29 12:18 PM
CLERK'S JUDGMENT re:75 Memorandum & Opinion in favor of Carron Staple against Shadia Alvarez. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated October 26, 2018, the Court holds that, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Alvarez, the complaints about school safety that she claims were the impetus for retaliation by Staple were the speech of an employee pursuant to her official duties, not the protected speech of a citizen. Accordingly Staple's summary judgment motion is granted and Alvarez's claim of retaliation under the First Amendment is dismissed; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 10/29/2018)(km)
Related: [-]
Att: 1 Right to Appeal
utility Terminate Transcript Deadlines Mon 10/29 12:20 PM
Terminate Transcript Deadlines (km)
Related: [-]
Friday, October 26, 2018
75 75 22 pgs order Memorandum & Opinion Fri 10/26 9:43 AM
OPINION & ORDER re:57 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Carron Staple. For the reasons above, the Court holds that, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Alvarez, the complaints about school safety that she claims were the impetus for retaliation by Staple were the speech of an employee pursuant to her official duties, not the protected speech of a citizen. The Court accordingly grants Staple's summary judgment motion and dismisses Alvarez's claim of retaliation under the First Amendment. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. 57 and to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 10/26/2018) (anc)
Related: [-]