Original Case: 1:15-cv-09323

Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
Case #: 0:17-cv-01577
Typecivil / private
Nature of Suit442 Civil Rights - Employment
Case Filed:Mar 20, 2017
Terminated:Apr 17, 2018
Last checked: Wednesday Apr 18, 2018 3:36 AM CDT
Defendant - Appellant
KATHY HAMILTON, in her official and individual capacity
Represented By
Frank J. Favia Jr.
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
contact info
Defendant - Appellant
DEANNE M. MAZZOCHI, in her official and individual capacity
Represented By
Jody A. Boquist
LITTLER MENDELSON P.C.
contact info
Defendant - Appellant
FRANK NAPOLITANO, in his official and individual capacity
Represented By
Andrew C. Porter
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH, LLP
contact info
Defendant - Appellant
CHARLES BERNSTEIN, in his official and individual capacity
Represented By
Andrew C. Porter
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH, LLP
contact info
Plaintiff - Appellee
ROBERT L. BREUDER
Represented By
Melissa N. Eubanks
FIGLIULO & SILVERMAN, P.C.
contact info
James R. Figliulo
FIGLIULO & SILVERMAN, P.C.
contact info

GPO Apr 17 2018
Filed opinion of the court by Judge Easterbook. The district court's decisions are AFFIRMED. Other matters may be reviewed on appeal from the final decision. Appeal No. 17-1577 is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction to the extent that appellants seek to present any issues beyond their request for qualified immunity. Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge; Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge and David F. Hamilton, Circuit Judge. [6918457-1] [6918457] [17-1577, 17-2215]

Docket last updated: 04/18/2018 3:30 AM CDT
Monday, March 20, 2017
1 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing Statement due for Appellants Charles Bernstein, Kathy Hamilton, Deanne M. Mazzochi and Frank Napolitano by 03/24/2017. Transcript information sheet due by 04/03/2017. Appellant's brief due on or before 05/01/2017 for Charles Bernstein, Kathy Hamilton, Deanne M. Mazzochi and Frank Napolitano. [1] [6827024] 17-1577 (CD)
Related: [-]
2 2 ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellant represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellants are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellant's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). [6827141] DW [2] [6827141] 17-1577 (CD)
Related: [-]