Virginia Duncan, et al v. Xavier Becerra
Original Case: 3:17-cv-01017
| Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals | |
| Case #: | 0:17-cv-56081 |
| Type | civil / private |
| Nature of Suit | 950 Other Statutes - Constitutionality of State Statutes |
| Case Filed: | Jul 28, 2017 |
| Terminated: | Jul 17, 2018 |
| Last checked: Thursday Jul 19, 2018 1:30 AM PDT |
|
Amicus Curiae
GAVIN NEWSOM
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
STATES OF ARIZONA, ALABAMA, ARKANSAS, GEORGIA, IDAHO, KANSAS, LOUISIANA, MICHIGAN, MISSOURI, MONTANA, NORTH DAKOTA, , OHIO, OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA, SOUTH DAKOTA, UTAH, WEST VIRGINIA, and WYOMING
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
CALIFORNIA STATE SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION, WESTERN STATES SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA RESERVE PEACE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, SAN FRANCISCO VETERAN POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA GANG INVESTIGATORS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT EDUCATOR
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION FREEDOM ACTION FOUNDATION
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
SHOOTERS COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION (SCOPE, INC.)
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
DOCTORS FOR RESPONSIBLE GUN OWNERSHIP, INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE, AND MILLENNIAL POLICY CENTER
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
GAYS AGAINST GUNS
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
EQUALITY CALIFORNIA
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
CITY OF SUNNYVALE
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
PRIDE FUND TO END GUN VIOLENCE
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
GIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, CALIFORNIA
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
CALIFORNIA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, HAWAII, ILLINOIS, IOWA, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, NEW YORK, OREGON, RHODE ISLAND, VIRGINIA, AND WASHINGTON
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant - Appellant
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellee
VIRGINIA DUNCAN
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellee
CALIFORNIA RIFLE & PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC., a California corporation
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellee
CHRISTOPHER WADDELL
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellee
DAVID MARGUGLIO
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellee
PATRICK LOVETTE
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellee
RICHARD LEWIS
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 07/19/2018 1:28 AM PDT |
| Friday, July 28, 2017 | ||
| 1 | 1
DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: to be set. Preliminary Injunction Appeal. C.R. 3-3. [10525018] (RT) [Entered: 07/28/2017 09:47 AM]
|
|
| 2 | 2
Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KAM): The appeal filed July 27, 2017 is a preliminary injunction appeal. Accordingly, Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 shall apply. The mediation questionnaire is due three days after the date of this order. If they have not already done so, within 7 calendar days after the filing date of this order, the parties shall make arrangements to obtain from the court reporter an official transcript of proceedings in the district court that will be included in the record on appeal. The briefing schedule shall proceed as follows: the opening brief and excerpts of record are due not later than August 24, 2017; the answering brief is due September 21, 2017 or 28 days after service of the opening brief, whichever is earlier; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. See 9th Cir. R. 3-3(b). The parties are reminded that streamlined requests for extensions of time are not available in preliminary injunction appeals. See http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/content/view.php?pk_id=0000000638. Any request for an extension of time must be requested under Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(b). Failure to file timely the opening brief shall result in the automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. . [10525450] (TSP) [Entered: 07/28/2017 12:02 PM]
|
|