Udd v. Phoenix, City of et al
| Arizona District Court | |
| Judge: | Dominic W Lanza |
| Case #: | 2:18-cv-01616 |
| Nature of Suit | 442 Civil Rights - Employment |
| Cause | 28:1441 Petition for Removal |
| Case Filed: | May 29, 2018 |
| Terminated: | Sep 24, 2021 |
| Last checked: Sunday Nov 25, 2018 1:27 AM MST |
|
Defendant
Phoenix, City of
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Mary Roberts
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
Darren Udd
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
Amy Udd
|
Represented By
|
| TERMINATED PARTIES | |
|
Defendant
Unknown Roberts
Terminated: 06/11/2018
|
|
GPO
Dec 21 2018
ready dismissed with prejudice in the preceding paragraph, DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 12/21/18. (MAW)ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The partial motion to dismiss (Doc. 11) is GRANTED; 2. All of Amy's state-law claims against Roberts (Counts 2, 3, 7, and 9) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 3. Amy's claims against the City of Phoenix for abuse of process and IIED (Counts 2 and 3) are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 4. The subset of Darren's state-law claims against Roberts that weren't identified in Darren's August 14, 2017 notice to Roberts, and which Darren attempted to articulate for the first time in his April 2, 2018 notice to Roberts, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and 5. Darren's claims against the City of Phoenix and Roberts for abuse of process and IIED (Counts 2 and 3) are, to the extent not al |
|
|
GPO
Mar 31 2020
dge Dominic W Lanza on 3/30/20. (MAW)ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Defendants' motion for summary judgment on all remaining claims (Doc. 98) is granted in part and denied in part. (2) Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. 100) is granted in part and denied in part. (3) Plaintiffs' motion to exclude Defendants' expert witness (Doc. 99) is granted in part and denied in part. (4) Plaintiffs' motion to strike (Doc. 111) is denied [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Ju |
|
|
GPO
Apr 17 2020
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the Udds' motion to supplement the summary judgment record and their MIDP disclosures (Doc. 120) is granted in part and denied in part [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 4/17/20. (MAW) |
|
|
GPO
Feb 12 2021
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that: (1) The City's first motion in limine (Doc. 137) is granted. Darren's state-law constructive discharge claim is dismissed. (2) The City's second motion in limine (Doc. 138) is denied. (3) The City's third motion in limine (Doc. 139) is denied. (4) The City's fourth motion in limine (Doc. 140) is denied. (5) The City's fifth motion in limine (Doc. 141) is denied without prejudice. rder for details] Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 2/12/21. (MAW) (6) Plaintiffs' motion in limine (Doc. 142) is granted in part and denied in part. (7) The City may, by March 5, 2021, file a renewed motion to exclude Dr. Wilsons opinion concerning "medical necessity." [see attached O |
|
|
GPO
May 05 2021
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the City's motion to preclude Plaintiffs' expert from offering a particular opinion at trial (Doc. 168) is granted [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 5/5/21. (MAW) |
| Docket last updated: 5 hours ago |
| Wednesday, March 09, 2022 | ||
| 241 | 241
appeal
USCA Mandate
Fri 03/11 3:42 PM
MANDATE of USCA re:239 Notice of Appeal filed by Amy Udd, Darren Udd. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties (Docket Entry No. 6), this appeal is voluntarily dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees on appeal. A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. (BAC) |
|