The Doris Behr 2012 Irrevocable Trust v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON
| New Jersey District Court | |
| Judge: | Michael A Shipp |
| Referred: | Rukhsanah L Singh |
| Case #: | 3:19-cv-08828 |
| Nature of Suit | 850 Other Statutes - Securities/Commodities/Exchange |
| Cause | 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
| Case Filed: | Mar 21, 2019 |
| Re-opened: | Jun 10, 2020 |
| Terminated: | May 08, 2023 |
| Last checked: Tuesday Sep 17, 2019 4:30 AM EDT |
|
Defendant
JOHNSON & JOHNSON
|
Represented By
|
|
Interested Party
Gurbir S Grewal
State of New Jersey, Office of the Attorney General Division of Law 124 Halsey Street POB 45029
Newark1, NJ 07101 |
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor
COLORADO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION
|
Represented By
|
|
Notice Only
PHV MICHAEL GRUNFELD
|
|
|
Notice Only
PHV HAL S. SCOTT
|
|
|
Notice Only
PHV JENNIFER PAFITI
|
|
|
Notice Only
PHV JONATHAN F. MITCHELL
|
|
|
Notice Only
PHV JEREMY A. LIEBERMAN
|
|
|
Notice Only
PHV DEEPAK GUPTA
|
|
|
Notice Only
PHV MARC I. GROSS
|
|
|
Notice Only
PHV SALVATORE J. GRAZIANO
|
|
|
Notice Only
PHV JAI K. CHANDRASEKHAR
|
|
|
Plaintiff
THE DORIS BEHR 2012 IRREVOCABLE TRUST
|
Represented By
|
| 1. | A Harvard Professor Filed a Shareholder Lawsuit to Restrict Shareholder Rights (theintercept.com) |
| Submitted Tue 04/09/2019 | |
| Docket last updated: 02/20/2026 11:59 PM EST |
| Wednesday, May 31, 2023 | ||
| 100 | 100
MANDATE of USCA as to97 Notice of Appeal (USCA), filed by Hal S. Scott, THE DORIS BEHR 2012 IRREVOCABLE TRUST. Costs taxed against the Appellants in the amount of $275.24. (Finance notified)(ca3cjg ) |
|
|
Att: 1
|
||
|
misc
Docket Annotation (public)
Wed 05/31 3:59 PM
Pursuant to97 USCA Mandate the USDC Opinion entered on 8/23/2023 is affirmed. (jal, ) |
||
|
appeal
Mandate Notice
Wed 05/31 4:00 PM
Pursuant to Local Rule 79.4, notice is hereby given of the Appellate ruling filed on 5/31/2023.. In the event that the mandate or judgment provides for costs or directs a disposition other than an affirmance, the prevailing party shall prepare and submit an order implementing the mandate or judgment. (jal, ) |
||