BladeRoom Group Ltd., et al v. Emerson Electric Co., et al

Original Case: 5:15-cv-01370

Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
Case #: 0:19-cv-16583
Typecivil / private
Nature of Suit190 Contract - Other Contract
Case Filed:Aug 12, 2019
Terminated:Aug 30, 2021
Last checked: Wednesday Sep 01, 2021 1:31 AM PDT
Defendant
FACEBOOK, INC.
Defendant
EMERSON NETWORK POWER SOLUTIONS, INC.
Defendant
LIEBERT CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellant
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO.
Represented By
Carter Glasgow Phillips
Sidley Austin, LLP
contact info
Constantine L. Trela Jr.
Sidley Austin LLP
contact info
Melinda Morton
Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP
contact info
Christopher Egleson
Sidley Austin, LLP
contact info
Plaintiff - Appellee
BLADEROOM GROUP LIMITED
Represented By
Eugene Y. Mar
Farella Braun & Martel LLP
contact info
James Alexander Reese
Farella Braun & Martel LLP
contact info
Jon B. Eisenberg
Horvitz & Levy LLP
contact info
Jeffrey M. Fisher
Farella Braun & Martel LLP
contact info
Jeffrey Lau
Farella Braun & Martel LLP
contact info
Stephanie Skaff
Farella Braun & Martel LLP
contact info
Plaintiff - Appellee
BRIPCO (UK) LIMITED
Represented By
Eugene Y. Mar
Farella Braun & Martel LLP
contact info
James Alexander Reese
Farella Braun & Martel LLP
contact info
Jon B. Eisenberg
Horvitz & Levy LLP
contact info
Jeffrey M. Fisher
Farella Braun & Martel LLP
contact info
Jeffrey Lau
Farella Braun & Martel LLP
contact info
Stephanie Skaff
Farella Braun & Martel LLP
contact info

GPO Aug 30 2021
FILED OPINION (JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON, PATRICK J. BUMATAY and STEPHEN JOSEPH MURPHY, III) We REVERSE the district courtâ??s order granting the motion in limine as it relates to the NDAâ??s twelfth paragraph. We VACATE the district courtâ??s judgment and post-verdict orders on appeal and REMAND for a new trial consistent with this opinion. Given the new trial, the orders related to attorneysâ?? and expert witnessâ?? fees in the 20-15758, 20-15759, 20-15760 appeals are also VACATED. Opinion by Judge Murphy; Concurrence by Judge Rawlinson. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [12214706] [19-16583, 19-16584, 19-16585, 19-16730, 20-15758, 20-15759, 20-15760]
GPO Dec 21 2021
Filed order and amended opinion (JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON, PATRICK J. BUMATAY and STEPHEN JOSEPH MURPHY, III). The Opinion and Concurrence filed on August 30, 2021 and reported at 11 F.4th 1010 is amended by the Opinion and Concurrence filed concurrently with this Order. With these amendments, the full court has been advised of the petitions for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on the petitions. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The panel unanimously votes to deny the petitions for panel rehearing. Judges Rawlinson and Bumatay vote to deny the petitions for rehearing en banc, and Judge Murphy so recommends. The petitions for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc will be accepted. [12321414] [19-16583, 19-16584, 19-16585, 19-16730, 20-15758, 20-15759, 20-15760]

Docket last updated: 09/01/2021 1:27 AM PDT
Monday, August 12, 2019
1 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 08/19/2019. Transcript ordered by 09/11/2019. Transcript due 10/11/2019. Appellant Emerson Electric Co. opening brief due 11/20/2019. Appellees BladeRoom Group Limited and Bripco (UK) Limited answering brief due 12/20/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11394837] (JBS) [Entered: 08/12/2019 04:01 PM]
Related: [-]
Att: 1 3 pgs Docketing Letter
Att: 2 1 pgs Mediation Letter
Att: 3 22 pgs Case Opening Packet