Hasmik Jasmine Chinaryan et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
| California Central District Court | |
| Judge: | Mark C Scarsi |
| Referred: | Charles F Eick |
| Case #: | 2:19-cv-09302 |
| Nature of Suit | 440 Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights |
| Cause | 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Case Filed: | Oct 29, 2019 |
| Re-opened: | Oct 17, 2024 |
| Terminated: | Oct 12, 2021 |
| Last checked: Sunday Apr 26, 2020 2:55 AM PDT |
|
Defendant
Los Angeles Police Department
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Chief of Police Michel Moore
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
City of Los Angeles
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Does
|
|
|
Defendant
Officer Gonzalez
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Officer Meneses
|
Represented By
|
|
Mediator (ADR Panel)
Richard T. Copeland
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
Hasmik Jasmine Chinaryan
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
Mariana Manuyan
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 05/23/2025 11:59 PM PDT |
| Friday, May 16, 2025 | ||
| 208 | 208
transcript
-Transcript Order Form (G-120)
Fri 05/16 1:33 PM
TRANSCRIPT ORDER as to Defendants City of Los Angeles, Fred Cueto, Daniel Gayton, Romero Gonzalez, Mario Menses, Brittany Oke, Eduardo Piche, Brittany Primo, Rodrigo Soria for Court Smart (CS). Court will contact Gloria Castillo at Gloria.Castillo@lacity.org with further instructions regarding this order. Transcript preparation will not begin until payment has been satisfied with the transcription company. (Ford, Ty) |
|
| Wednesday, May 14, 2025 | ||
| 207 | 207
transcript
-Transcript Order Form (G-120)
Wed 05/14 3:30 PM
TRANSCRIPT ORDER as to Plaintiff Hasmik Jasmine Chinaryan, Nare E Chinaryan for Court Smart (CS). Court will contact Deirdre Lewis at dl@johnburtonlaw.com with further instructions regarding this order. Transcript preparation will not begin until payment has been satisfied with the transcription company. (Burton, John) |
|
| Tuesday, May 13, 2025 | ||
| 206 | 206
order
Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held
Tue 05/13 5:48 PM
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER REQUIRING ADDITIONAL BRIEFING. Court orders the parties to submit additional briefing addressing the following issues: - Would a verdict in favor of Plaintiffs at the second trial conflict, as a matter of law, with the verdict in favor of Defendants at the first trial? If not, how? - If the verdicts conflict, what action can the Court take to remedy the conflict given the Ninth Circuit's mandate affirming the judgment in favor of the City and LAPD? - How should the jury in the second trial be instructed as to the jurys findings in the first trial, if at all? Simultaneous opening briefs are due June 3, 2025. Response briefs are due June 17, 2025. All briefs must comply with Local Rule 11-6, including the word count limitation. After reviewing the briefing, the Court will issue an order on nextsteps. (lc) |
|
| Monday, May 12, 2025 | ||
| 205 | 205
minutes
Pretrial Conference - Final - optional html form
Tue 05/13 10:11 AM
MINUTES of Final Pretrial Conference and Hearing on Motions in Limine held before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. The Court confers with counsel regarding the status of the case. For reasons stated on the record, the Court VACATES the Final Pretrial Conference (together with the hearing on the motions in limine) and the Jury Trial to be reset at a later time. The Court will issue an order for additional briefing on the specific issues to be addressed at trial in light of the Ninth Circuit's order. Attorney for Plaintiff(s): John C. Burton and Morgan Ricketts. Attorney for Defendant(s): Ty A. Ford. Courtroom Deputy: Stephen Montes Kerr. Time in Court: 25 mins. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. Court Reporter: CourtSmart. (smo) Modified on 5/13/2025 (smo) |
|