Lee et al v. HDR Global Trading Limited et al
| New York Southern District Court | |
| Judge: | Andrew L Carter, Jr |
| Referred: | Stewart D Aaron |
| Case #: | 1:20-cv-03232 |
| Nature of Suit | 850 Other Statutes - Securities/Commodities/Exchange |
| Cause | 7:6(b) Federal Commodity Exchange Regulation |
| Case Filed: | Apr 23, 2020 |
| Terminated: | Jun 30, 2025 |
| Last checked: Tuesday Jul 01, 2025 12:55 PM EDT |
|
Defendant
ABS Global Trading Limited
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
HDR Global Trading Limited
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Ben Delo
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Arthur Hayes
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Samuel Reed
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
100x Holdings Limited
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Greg Dwyer
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
HDR Global Services (Bermuda)
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Shine Effort Inc Limited
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
Felix Lufkin
|
Represented By
|
| TERMINATED PARTIES | |
|
Plaintiff
Drew Lee
Terminated: 06/30/2025
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated 171 Great Neck Road
Great Neck, NY 11021 |
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
Brett Messieh
Terminated: 09/11/2024
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated 1426 Nicholson Rd
Jacksonville, FL 32207 |
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 06/03/2026 11:59 PM EDT |
| Monday, June 30, 2025 | ||
| 261 | 261
2
pgs
order
Order of Dismissal ~Util - Add and Terminate Parties
Mon 06/30 2:28 PM
ORDER... Plaintiff Lee is dismissed from this action. Moreover, in light of the stipulation and order filed earlier today (docketed at ECF No. 260), the Court respectfully directs the Clerk of Court to terminate this action. SO ORDERED., (Drew Lee (individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated) terminated.) (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 6/30/25) (yv) |
|
| 260 | 260
4
pgs
order
Stipulation and Order of Voluntary Dismissal
Mon 06/30 12:10 PM
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a)(2): IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED TO AND AGREED by and between the undersigned counsel for Plaintiff Felix Lufkin and the Proposed Class and for Defendants as stated below, subject to the Court's approval, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2): 1. Plaintiff Felix Lufkin's individual claims in this action are dismissed with prejudice. 2. Plaintiff Felix Lufkin (and each of his respective present and former agents, predecessors, successors, assigns, and attorneys), on the one hand, and Defendants (and each of their respective present and former parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, officers, directors, shareholders, members, successors, assigns, and attorneys), on the other hand, respectively each release all Claims (as defined) against the other. "Claims" shall mean any and all manner of claims, causes of action, cross claims, counter-claims, charges, liabilities, demands, judgment, suits, obligations, debts, setoffs, right of recovery, or liabilities for any obligation of any kind whatsoever (however denominated), in law or equity or arising under constitution, statute, tort, regulation, ordinance, contract, or otherwise in nature, for fees, costs, penalties, fines, debts, expenses, attorneys' fees, and damages, whenever incurred, and liabilities of any nature whatsoever (including joint and several), known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, asserted or unasserted, which any party ever had, now has, or hereafter can, shall or may have, individually, representatively, derivatively, or in any other capacity, arising from or relating in any way to conduct alleged in this action or that could have been alleged in this action, or arising from the same factual predicate of this action or the bringing of this action, or concerning, relating to, or arising out of use of BitMEX or products traded on BitMEX through the date of this Stipulation. 3. The putative class claims in this action are dismissed without prejudice. 4. Each party shall bear their own costs and expenses. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 6/30/25) (yv) |
|