Original Case: 3:19-cv-12540

Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
Case #: 0:20-cv-01870
Typecivil / private / civil rights
Nature of Suit440 Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights
Case Filed:Apr 23, 2020
Terminated:Aug 04, 2021
Last checked: Thursday Aug 05, 2021 4:27 AM EDT
Defendant
FRANK BRUNO, individually, and in his official capacity, as the Somerset County Surrogate
Represented By
Angela C. Jupin
Law Office of William T. Copper
contact info
Defendant
DEBRA E. CANOVA, individually, and in his official capacity, as the Somerset County Surrogate
Represented By
Louis P. Lepore
contact info
Defendant - Appellee
MARGARET GOODZEIT, individually, and in her official capacity, as Presiding Judge, Somerset County Chancery
Represented By
Andrew C. Munger
Office of Attorney General of New Jersey
contact info
Defendant - Appellee
FRANK BRUNO, individually, and in his official capacity, as the Somerset County Surrogate
Represented By
Angela C. Jupin
Law Office of William T. Copper
contact info
Defendant - Appellee
LOUIS P. LEPORE, Individually and , the Law Offices of Louis Lepore P.C. and Louis Lepore, Esq., LLC.
Represented By
Louis P. Lepore
contact info
Defendant - Appellee
DEBRA E. CANOVA
Represented By
Louis P. Lepore
contact info
Defendant - Appellee
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, New Jersey Courts, Middlesex County Surrogate and County
Represented By
Andrew C. Munger
Office of Attorney General of New Jersey
contact info
Defendant - Appellee
ALBERTO RIVAS
Represented By
Andrew C. Munger
Office of Attorney General of New Jersey
contact info
Defendant - Appellee
STAURT J. RABNER
Represented By
Andrew C. Munger
Office of Attorney General of New Jersey
contact info
Defendant - Appellee
STUART RABNER
Represented By
Andrew C. Munger
Office of Attorney General of New Jersey
contact info
Defendant - Appellee
LAW OFFICE OF JOHN W THATCHER LLC
Represented By
Meredith K. Stoma
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith
contact info
Plaintiff - Appellant
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO, individually and as Guardian, of A.M., J.M., and M.M., minors
Represented By
John F. Marchisotto
contact info

GPO Aug 04 2021
NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: MCKEE, SHWARTZ and RESTREPO, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 7. Marshisotto's Motion for Leave to Exceed Brief Page and Word Count" (Doc. 71), his "Motion to Lodge Exhibits" (Doc. 81), and his "Motion to Lodge Exhibits, with Testimony Evidence, and Documentary Evidence" (Doc. 84), are granted. We deny his motions to disqualify opposing counsel (Docs. 16, 25, 60), including his motion to dismiss the Law Office of John W. Thatcher as a party to the appeal (Doc. 92), his motions to recuse Judge Rivas (Docs 30, 31), and his requests to dismiss an order issued by the Superior Court (Ocean County) (Doc. 162, 163, 164). To the extent that Marchisotto's numerous letter and other documents filed in thus Court seek any other relief, his requests are denied.

Docket last updated: 08/05/2021 4:27 AM EDT
Thursday, April 23, 2020
RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (TMM)
Related: [-]
CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant John F. Marchisotto in District Court No. 3-19-cv-12540. (TMM)
Related: [-]
Att: 1 1 pgs Civil Case Docketed
Att: 2 3 pgs DC Order 4/22/20
Att: 3 1 pgs caption
Att: 4 1 pgs Standing Order
Att: 5 2 pgs Case Opening Letter
1 pgs ORDER (Clerk) Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 113.12 and the Judicial Conference Policy on Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Cases, personal identifier information must be redacted from filings. These identifiers include Social Security numbers, names of minor children, financial account numbers, dates of birth, and home addresses in criminal cases. Litigants are responsible for redacting documents. This Courts's Local Appellate Rules and a link to the Judicial Conference policy are available at www.ca3.uscourts,gov. Accordingly, this action has been docketed using the initials of the minor children instead of the minor children's full names. It is noted that the parties appropriately ensured the privacy of the minor children in the District Court proceeding, and it is anticipated that they will continue to do so in this appeal. Counsel should comply with L.A.R. 113.12 and the Judicial Conference Policy on Privacy. All filings should be in compliance with local rule and that policy. The Clerk will not review each filing for compliance with L.A.R. 113.12. (TMM)
Related: [-]