POLYSCIENCES, INC. v. MASRUD
Pennsylvania Eastern District Court | |
Judge: | Nitza I Quinones Alejandr |
Case #: | 2:20-cv-03649 |
Nature of Suit | 890 Other Statutes - Other Statutory Actions |
Cause | 18:1836(a) Injunction Against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets |
Case Filed: | Jul 27, 2020 |
Last checked: Saturday Jan 23, 2021 5:00 AM EST |
Counter Claimant
JOSEPH T. MASRUD
|
Represented By
|
Counter Defendant
POLYSCIENCES, INC.
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
JOSEPH T. MASRUD
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
POLYSCIENCES, INC.
|
Represented By
|
Respondent
MATTHEW W. GRIFFIN
1705 MORRIS CT.
NORTH WALES, PA 19454 |
Docket last updated: 6 hours ago |
Tuesday, May 13, 2025 | ||
297 | 297
![]() ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO SEAL, (ECF 294), AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED, AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PLACE EXHIBITS 1 THROUGH 3 TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO RECONSIDER, (ECF 293-3, 293-4, AND 293-5), UNDER SEAL. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 5/13/2025.5/13/2025 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg) |
|
296 | 296
![]() RESPONSE in Opposition re293 MOTION for Reconsideration re280 Order on Motion for Sanctions, filed by JOSEPH T. MASRUD, SEROCHEM LLC.. (PECK, JULIANNE) |
|
Monday, May 12, 2025 | ||
295 | 295
![]() Exhibits re293 MOTION for Reconsideration by POLYSCIENCES, INC. *FILED UNDER SEAL* (lisad, ) (lisad, ) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Att: 2
![]() |
||
294 | 294
![]() MOTION to Seal Document293 MOTION for Reconsideration re280 Order on Motion for Sanctions, Exhibits 1 through 3 filed by POLYSCIENCES, INC., POLYSCIENCES, INC..Certificate of Service.(VERNICK, SCOTT) |
|
293 | 293
![]() MOTION for Reconsideration re280 Order on Motion for Sanctions, filed by POLYSCIENCES, INC., POLYSCIENCES, INC..Brief and Certificate of Service. |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Att: 2
![]() |
||
Att: 3
![]() |
||
Att: 4
![]() |
||
Att: 5
![]() |
||
Att: 6
![]() |
||
Thursday, May 08, 2025 | ||
292 | 292
![]() ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE DEFENDANTS FROM INTRODUCING EVIDENCE OF PRIOR ROUTINE DISCOVERY DISPUTES, (ECF 234), DEFENDANTS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION, (ECF 261), AND PLAINTIFFS REPLY, (ECF 270), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED. ACCORDINGLY, DEFENDANTS ARE PRECLUDED FROM INTRODUCING ANY EVIDENCE AND/OR ARGUMENT WITH RESPECT TO DISCOVERY DISPUTES THAT OCCURRED OVER THE COURSE OF THIS LITIGATION. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 5/8/2025.5/8/2025 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg) |
|
291 | 291
![]() ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANTS MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE IRRELEVANT AND PREJUDICIAL STATEMENTS IN POLYSCIENCES TRADE SECRET IDENTIFICATIONS, (ECF 241, 248), AND PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION, (ECF 259), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS DENIED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 5/8/2025.5/8/2025 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg) |
|
290 | 290
![]() ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE SPECIFIC INADMISSIBLE ABUSE OF PROCESS ARGUMENTS AND EVIDENCE, (ECF 231), DEFENDANTS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION, (ECF 262), AND PLAINTIFFS REPLY, (ECF 270), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (1) THE MOTION IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO THE INTRODUCTION OF ANY EVIDENCE OR ARGUMENT AS TO PLAINTIFFS ALLEGED FAILURES TO COMPLY WITH DISCOVERY OBLIGATIONS OR ORDERS; AND (2) THE MOTION IS DENIED WITH RESPECT TO THE INTRODUCTION OF ANY EVIDENCE OR ARGUMENT AS TO PLAINTIFFS INITIATION AND CONTINUATION OF THIS LITIGATION AND THE JOINTLY REQUESTED AND AGREED-TO PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 5/8/2025.5/8/2025 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg) |
|
289 | 289
![]() ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE DEFENDANTS FROM INTRODUCING SUPPOSED EVIDENCE OF LOST PROFITS, (ECF 232), DEFENDANTS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION, (ECF 256), AND PLAINTIFFS REPLY, (ECF 271), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 5/8/2025.5/8/2025 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg) |
|
288 | 288
![]() ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANTS MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE CONCERNING OR REFERENCING CO-DEFENDANT MATHEW GRIFFINS DISMISSED ABUSE OF PROCESS COUNTERCLAIM, (ECF 239), AND PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION, (ECF 257), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED. ACCORDINGLY, PLAINTIFF IS PRECLUDED FROM INTRODUCING ANY EVIDENCE AND/OR ARGUMENT REGARDING THE DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT MATHEW GRIFFINS ABUSE OF PROCESS CLAIM. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 5/8/2025.5/8/2025 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg) |
|
287 | 287
![]() ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFFS OMNIBUS MOTION IN LIMINE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 401, 402, AND 403, (ECF 233), AND DEFENDANTS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION, (ECF 260), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (1) PLAINTIFFS MOTION IS GRANTED, BY AGREEMENT, WITH RESPECT TO THE PRECLUSION OF EVIDENCE OF UNRELATED LAWSUITS; AND (2) THE MOTION IS DENIED WITH RESPECT TO EVIDENCE OF INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT 6,013,240 AND POLYSCIENCES FINANCIAL POSITION. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 5/8/2025.5/8/2025 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg) |
|
286 | 286
![]() ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANTS MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE LEGAL CONCLUSIONS AND/OR STATE OF MIND OPINIONS BY DR. JOACHIM KOHN, (ECF 240, 247), AND PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION, (ECF 258), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 5/8/2025.5/8/2025 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg) |
|
285 | 285
![]() ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ORAL ARGUMENT (DOC. 268) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 5/8/2025.5/8/2025 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg) |
|
Wednesday, May 07, 2025 | ||
284 | 284
![]() NOTICE by MATHEW W. GRIFFIN, MATHEW GRIFFIN, JOSEPH T. MASRUD, SEROCHEM LLC. Corrected Deposition Designations for Michael ("Ryan") Ott (PECK, JULIANNE) |
|
283 | 283
![]() NOTICE by POLYSCIENCES, INC. of Deposition Designations(VERNICK, SCOTT) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Att: 2
![]() |
||
Tuesday, May 06, 2025 | ||
282 | 282
![]() PLAINTIFF POLYSCIENCES, INC.S SUR-REPLY IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS EMERGENCY MOTION FOR SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 37 (ECF 252), filed by POLYSCIENCES, INC.. (sg) |
|
281 | 281
![]() ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY, (ECF 279), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED, AND THE SUR-REPLY ATTACHED TO THE UNDERLYING MOTION AS EXHIBIT A SHALL BE DEEMED FILED. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 5/6/2025. 5/7/2025 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg) |