Rose v. City of Suisun City et al
California Eastern District Court | |
Judge: | Dale A Drozd |
Referred: | Carolyn K Delaney |
Case #: | 2:21-cv-02214 |
Nature of Suit | 360 Torts - Personal Injury - Other Personal Injury |
Cause | 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
Case Filed: | Dec 01, 2021 |
Terminated: | Apr 02, 2025 |
Case in other court: | Solano Superior Court, FCS057055 |
Last checked: Monday May 30, 2022 2:33 AM PDT |
Defendant
Amtrak
|
|
Defendant
City of Suisun City
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Nickolas G. Rose
4501 Pampas Ave.
Oakland, CA 94619 |
Represented By
|
Docket last updated: 05/02/2025 11:59 PM PDT |
Wednesday, April 02, 2025 | ||
49 | 49
![]() JUDGMENT dated *4/2/2025* pursuant to order signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/1/2025 in favor of City of Suisun City. (Deputy Clerk RRB) |
|
48 | 48
![]() ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/1/2025 GRANTING the42 motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by defendant City of Suisun City as to all claims asserted against it, without leave to amend. CASE CLOSED. (Deputy Clerk RRB) |
|
Wednesday, November 20, 2024 | ||
47 | 47
![]() STATEMENT of NON-OPPOSITION by Nickolas G. Rose to42 Motion for Judgment,. (Siegal, Joel) |
|
Tuesday, November 19, 2024 | ||
46 | 46
order
Minute Order
Tue 11/19 12:47 PM
MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/19/2024: Having considered plaintiff's45 response, the 44 order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed due to plaintiff's failure to prosecute is hereby DISCHARGED. (Buzo, P) |
|
Monday, November 18, 2024 | ||
45 | 45
![]() STATEMENT of NON-OPPOSITION by Nickolas G. Rose to42 Motion for Judgment,. (Richardson, Richard) |
|
Tuesday, November 12, 2024 | ||
44 | 44
order
Minute Order ~Util - 1 Terminate Deadlines and Hearings
Tue 11/12 11:36 AM
MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/12/2024: Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), because defendant City of Suisun City filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings on 10/11/2024, plaintiff's deadline to file either an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the pending motion was on 10/25/2024. Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Local Rules in this regard. On 11/4/2024, defendant City of Suisun City filed a43 reply identifying this failure. Notably, plaintiff has not filed any response to this43 filing either. Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE , by no later than 11/18/2024, why this action should not be dismissed due to plaintiff's failure to comply with this court's Local Rules and apparent failure to prosecute this action. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to respond to this order to show cause may result in dismissal. In addition, the hearing on the pending42 motion set for 11/19/2024 is hereby VACATED, to be reset at a later date if the court determines that oral argument is needed. (Buzo, P) |
|
Monday, November 04, 2024 | ||
43 | 43
![]() REPLY by City of Suisun City re42 Motion for Judgment,. (Lewis, Danielle) |
|
Friday, October 11, 2024 | ||
42 | 42
![]() MOTION for JUDGMENT On The Pleadings by City of Suisun City. Motion Hearing set for 11/19/2024 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Lewis, Danielle) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Att: 2
![]() |
||
Wednesday, April 17, 2024 | ||
41 | 41
![]() ANSWER by City of Suisun City.(Lewis, Danielle) |
|
Tuesday, April 16, 2024 | ||
40 | 40
![]() JUDGMENT dated *04/16/2024* pursuant to order signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 04/15/2024 in favor of Amtrak and Union Pacific Railroad Company against Nickolas G. Rose. (Nair, C) |
|
39 | 39
![]() ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 04/15/2024 GRANTING35 Defendants Motion for Judgment without leave to amend. Defendants Amtrak and Union Pacific Railroad Company have been terminated from this action. The Clerk of the Court shall enter Judgment for Defendants Amtrak and Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Nair, C) |
|
Wednesday, November 15, 2023 | ||
38 | 38
![]() REPLY BRIEF by Amtrak, Union Pacific Railroad Company in Support of Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings re37 Opposition to Motion. (Offill-Klein, Alexei) Modified on 11/16/2023 |
|
Monday, November 13, 2023 | ||
37 | 37
![]() OPPOSITION by Nickolas G. Rose to35 Motion for Judgment,. (Siegal, Joel) |
|
36 | 36
order
Minute Order ~Util - Motions Submitted/Under Advisement Order on Motion for Judgment
Mon 11/13 1:32 PM
MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/13/2023: Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the pending35 Motion is SUBMITTED without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for 12/5/2023 is VACATED, to be reset at a later date if the court determines that oral argument is needed.(Buzo, P) |
|
Tuesday, October 31, 2023 | ||
35 | 35
![]() MOTION for JUDGMENT on the Pleadings by Amtrak, Union Pacific Railroad Company. Attorney Laughlin, John added. Motion Hearing set for 12/5/2023 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd.(Laughlin, John) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Att: 2
![]() |
||
Tuesday, January 03, 2023 | ||
34 | 34
![]() NOTICE OF CHANGE IN COUNSEL CONTACT INFORMATION by City of Suisun City. (Lewis, Danielle) |
|
Friday, October 14, 2022 | ||
33 | 33
![]() ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/13/2022 SUBSTITUTING Attorney Alexei Offill-Klein (Allen Glaessner Hazelwood & Werth LLP) for Alexei Offill-Klein (Castillo, Moriarty, Tran & Robinson). (Spichka, K.) |
|
32 | 32
![]() ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/13/2022 SUBSTITUTING Attorney Vincent Castillo (Allen Glaessner Hazelwood & Werth LLP) for Vincent Castillo (Castillo, Moriarty, Tran & Robinson). (Spichka, K.) |
|
Thursday, October 13, 2022 | ||
31 | 31
![]() NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Union Pacific Railroad Company. Attorney Castillo, Vincent added. (Castillo, Vincent) |
|
30 | 30
![]() NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Amtrak. Attorney Castillo, Vincent added. (Castillo, Vincent) |
|
Tuesday, October 11, 2022 | ||
29 | 29
![]() ANSWER with Jury Demand by Union Pacific Railroad Company. Attorney Offill-Klein, Alexei N. added.(Offill-Klein, Alexei) |
|
28 | 28
![]() ANSWER with Jury Demand by Amtrak.(Offill-Klein, Alexei) |
|
Friday, September 30, 2022 | ||
27 | 27
![]() SUBSTITUTION of ATTORNEY - PROPOSED, submitted by Amtrak. (Offill-Klein, Alexei) |
|
26 | 26
![]() SUBSTITUTION of ATTORNEY - PROPOSED, submitted by Amtrak. (Castillo, Vincent) |
|
Tuesday, September 27, 2022 | ||
25 | 25
![]() STIPULATION re18 Amended Complaint to Extend Responsive Pleading Deadline by Amtrak. Attorney Offill-Klein, Alexei N. added. (Offill-Klein, Alexei) |
|
Monday, September 26, 2022 | ||
order
Minute Order
Mon 09/26 1:59 PM
MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/26/2022: Pursuant to the parties'23 Stipulation, plaintiff shall file its second amended complaint within seven (7) days from the date of entry of this order, and defendant shall file a response to plaintiff's second amended complaint no later than twenty-one (21) days after the filing of the second amended complaint. (Buzo, P) |
||
Friday, September 23, 2022 | ||
23 | 23
![]() STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint by Nickolas G. Rose. (Siegal, Joel) |
|
Tuesday, September 20, 2022 | ||
order
Minute Order
Tue 09/20 12:23 PM
MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/20/2022. On 9/16/2022, plaintiff and defendant City of Suisun City filed a21 Stipulation to extend the time for defendant City of Suisun City to respond to the19 First Amended Complaint. Pursuant to the21 stipulation, and good cause appearing, defendant City of Suisun City's responsive pleading deadline to the19 first amended complaint is hereby extended to 9/30/2022.(Buzo, P) |
||
Friday, September 16, 2022 | ||
21 | 21
![]() STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extending Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint by City of Suisun City. (Lewis, Danielle) |
|
Friday, September 02, 2022 | ||
20 | 20
![]() SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Union Pacific Railroad Company* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Joel H. Siegal* *Siegal & Richardson, LLP* *436 14th Street, Suite 1106* *Oakland, California 94612*. (Zignago, K.) |
|
Friday, August 26, 2022 | ||
19 | 19
![]() FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Nickolas G. Rose.(Siegal, Joel) |
|
18 | 18
![]() FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Nickolas G. Rose by Nickolas G. Rose.(Siegal, Joel) |
|
Thursday, August 25, 2022 | ||
17 | 17
![]() STANDING ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 08/25/22. (Benson, A.) |
|
16 | 16
![]() ORDER by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: The Court having considered the equitable division and efficient and economical determination of court business, hereby reassigns this case from District Judge *Troy L. Nunley* to * District Judge Dale A. Drozd* for all further proceedings. (Benson, A.) |
|
Wednesday, August 10, 2022 | ||
15 | 15
![]() ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/8/22 GRANTING3 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss as follows: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count One is GRANTED with leave to amend; Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count Two is GRANTED without leave to amend; and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count Three is GRANTED with leave to amend. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within 30 days of the electronic filing date of this Order. Defendant's responsive pleading is due within 21 days of the electronic filing date of Plaintiff's amended complaint. (Kastilahn, A) |
|
Thursday, February 03, 2022 | ||
14 | 14
![]() REPLY by City of Suisun City to RESPONSE to3 Motion to Dismiss. (Lewis, Danielle) Modified on 2/3/2022 (Kaminski, H) |
|
Thursday, January 13, 2022 | ||
order
Minute Order ~Util - Motions Submitted/Under Advisement
Thu 01/13 7:47 AM
MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy M. Krueger for District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/13/2022: On the Court's own motion, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No.3 ) is hereby SUBMITTED without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for 2/10/2022 is VACATED. If the Court determines oral argument is necessary, it will be scheduled at a later date. Defendant may still file a reply brief in accordance with Local Rule 230(d) and the 2/10/2022 date. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Krueger, M) |
||
Wednesday, January 12, 2022 | ||
12 | 12
![]() OPPOSITION by Nickolas G. Rose to3 Motion to Dismiss,. (Siegal, Joel) |
|
Monday, January 10, 2022 | ||
11 | 11
![]() CONSENT to VDRP by Nickolas G. Rose.(Siegal, Joel) |
|
10 | 10
![]() CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Siegal, Joel) |
|
Wednesday, January 05, 2022 | ||
8 | 8
![]() CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Donati, J) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Att: 2
![]() |
||
6 | 6
![]() ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 01/05/2022 GRANTING Substitution of Attorney5 . Joel H. Siegal and Richard L. Richardson added as counsel for the Plaintiff.(Streeter, J) |
|
5 | 5
![]() SUBSTITUTION of ATTORNEY - PROPOSED, submitted by Nickolas G. Rose. (Siegal, Joel) |
|
order
Minute Order ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings Order on Motion to Dismiss
Wed 01/05 2:05 PM
MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy J. Streeter for Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 01/05/2021: The Court has granted the substitution of attorneys Joel H. Siegel and Richard L. Richardson as counsel for plaintiff who was previously proceeding pro se in this case (ECF No.5 ). Pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21), the case is referred back to the assigned District Judge, Troy L Nunley and the Pro Se designation is removed. All previously scheduled deadlines and hearing dates before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney are VACATED.(Streeter, J) |
||
order
Minute Order ~Util - Set/Reset Motion Hearing
Wed 01/05 3:09 PM
MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy M. Krueger for District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/5/2022: In light of the order referring this case back to District Judge Troy L. Nunley, the Hearing on Defendant City of Suisun City's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No.3 ) is hereby RESET for 2/10/2022 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. All briefing shall be filed in accordance with Local Rule 230 and the new hearing date. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Krueger, M) |
||
Tuesday, January 04, 2022 | ||
4 | 4
![]() NOTICE of Substitution of Attorney by Nickolas G. Rose. Attorney Siegal, Joel H. added. (Siegal, Joel) |
|
Wednesday, December 08, 2021 | ||
3 | 3
![]() MOTION to DISMISS by City of Suisun City. Motion Hearing set for 1/26/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney.(Lewis, Danielle) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Att: 2
![]() |
||
Att: 3
![]() |
||
Att: 4
![]() |
||
Wednesday, December 01, 2021 | ||
2 | 2
![]() CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference SET for 5/4/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
1 | 1
![]() NOTICE of REMOVAL from Solano Superior Court, case number FCS057055 by City of Suisun City.(Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-9952760) (Lewis, Danielle) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Att: 2
![]() |
||
service
Service by Mail
Wed 12/01 5:15 PM
SERVICE BY MAIL:2 Civil New Case Documents for TLN served on Nickolas G Rose. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |