USA v. Ruiz
Texas Northern District Court | |
Case #: | 3:22-mj-00014 |
Case Filed: | Jan 10, 2022 |
Last checked: Wednesday Jan 12, 2022 1:24 AM CST |
Defendant
Ernesto Almanza, Jr. (3)
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Gissele Aileen Cano-Ramirez (2)
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Juan Antonio Ruiz (1)
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
USA
|
Represented By
|
Docket last updated: 01/12/2022 1:33 AM CST |
Monday, January 10, 2022 | ||
Arrest of Juan Antonio Ruiz, Gissele Aileen Cano-Ramirez, Ernesto Almanza, Jr (mcrd) | ||
1 | 1
![]() |
|
3 | 3
![]() |
|
4 | 4
![]() |
|
5 | 5 ELECTRONIC ORDER As to Juan Antonio Ruiz: by this order -- issued to the prosecution and defense counsel -- the court confirms the disclosure obligation of the prosecutor under Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny, and the possible consequences of violating such order under applicable law. This written order is entered pursuant to Rule 5(f)(1) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and is in addition to the oral order entered by the court on the first scheduled court date when both the prosecutor and defense counsel were present. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 1/10/2022) (mcrd) | |
6 | 6
![]() |
|
7 | 7 ELECTRONIC ORDER finding as moot3 Motion to Continue as to Juan Antonio Ruiz (1). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 1/10/2022) (mcrd) | |
8 | 8 ELECTRONIC ORDER As to Gissele Aileen Cano-Ramirez: by this order -- issued to the prosecution and defense counsel -- the court confirms the disclosure obligation of the prosecutor under Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny, and the possible consequences of violating such order under applicable law. This written order is entered pursuant to Rule 5(f)(1) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and is in addition to the oral order entered by the court on the first scheduled court date when both the prosecutor and defense counsel were present. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 1/10/2022) (mcrd) | |
10 | 10
![]() |
|
11 | 11
![]() |
|
12 | 12
![]() |
|
13 | 13
![]() |
|
14 | 14 ELECTRONIC ORDER As to Ernesto Almanza, Jr: by this order -- issued to the prosecution and defense counsel -- the court confirms the disclosure obligation of the prosecutor under Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny, and the possible consequences of violating such order under applicable law. This written order is entered pursuant to Rule 5(f)(1) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and is in addition to the oral order entered by the court on the first scheduled court date when both the prosecutor and defense counsel were present. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 1/10/2022) (mcrd) | |
15 | 15
![]() |
|
16 | 16 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting the3 Motion to Continue as to Ernesto Almanza Jr. (3). Preliminary Hearing and Detention Hearing set for 1/14/2022 09:30 AM in US Courthouse, Courtroom 1306, 1100 Commerce St., Dallas, TX 75242-1310 before Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 1/10/2022) (mcrd) | |
17 | 17
![]() |
|
18 | 18
![]() |
|
19 | 19
![]() |
|
20 | 20 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting the3 Motion to Continue as to Gissele Aileen Cano-Ramirez (2). Preliminary Hearing and Detention Hearing set for 1/14/2022 09:30 AM in US Courthouse, Courtroom 1306, 1100 Commerce St., Dallas, TX 75242-1310 before Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 1/10/2022) (mcrd) | |
21 | 21
![]() |
|
22 | 22
![]() |