USA v. Ortiz et al
| California Southern District Court | |
| Case #: | 3:22-mj-01517 |
| Case Filed: | May 02, 2022 |
| Last checked: Thursday May 05, 2022 1:04 AM PDT |
|
Defendant
Angelica Monique Madueno (2)
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Fernando Valdemar Ortiz (1)
|
Represented By
|
|
Material Witness
Juan Delgado-Munos
|
Represented By
|
|
Material Witness
Juan Diego Guerrero-Rizo
|
Represented By
|
|
Material Witness
L.M.V.
|
Represented By
|
|
Material Witness
Julio Cesar Valadez Fernandez
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
USA
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 05/08/2022 11:33 AM PDT |
| Friday, April 29, 2022 | ||
| Arrest of Fernando Valdemar Ortiz, Angelica Monique Madueno (no document attached) (ekb) | ||
| Monday, May 02, 2022 | ||
| 1 | 1
7
pgs
COMPLAINT as to Fernando Valdemar Ortiz, Angelica Monique Madueno.(ekb)
|
|
|
Att: 1
Info Sheet
|
||
| 2 | 2 Minute Order. Material Witness Attorney Christopher K. Monelt appointed for Julio Cesar Valadez Fernandez, Juan Diego Guerrero-Rizo, and Juan Delgado-Munos. Set/Reset Duty Hearings as to Fernando Valdemar Ortiz, Angelica Monique Madueno: Initial Appearance set for 5/2/2022 before Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler. (no document attached) (ekb) | |
| 3 | 3 Set/Reset Duty Hearings as to Fernando Valdemar Ortiz, Angelica Monique Madueno: Arraignment of MW Julio Cesar Valadez Fernandez, Juan Diego Guerrero-Rizo, and Juan Delgado-Munos set for 5/3/2022 before Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo. (no document attached) (mme) | |
| 4 | 4 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler: Initial Appearance as to Fernando Valdemar Ortiz (1) held on 5/2/2022. Defendant consents to proceed via VTC. Attorney Jason T. Conforti(n/a) provisionally appointed. Financial Affidavit due at next hearing. Government oral motion to detain (Flight). ( Detention Hearing - RF set for 5/4/2022 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo.) Rule 5 advisement provided. ( Preliminary Hearing set for 5/12/22 at 9:00am before Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo. Arraignment set for 5/26/22 at 9:00am before Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo. ) (CD# 5/2/2022 AGS 22-1:2:46-2:56). (Plaintiff Attorney Badih Mouannes AUSA). (Defendant Attorney Daniell Lee FD-S/A). (aje) | |
| 5 | 5 ***English. No Interpreter needed as to Fernando Valdemar Ortiz, Angelica Monique Madueno (no document attached) (aje) | |
| 6 | 6 Oral MOTION to Detain (Flight)by USA as to Fernando Valdemar Ortiz. (no document attached) (aje) | |
| 7 | 7
2
pgs
ORDER Setting Conditions of Release. Bond set for Angelica Monique Madueno (2) $15,000 PS (1 FRRA).. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 5/2/22. (ecf)
|
|
| 8 | 8
2
pgs
ABSTRACT OF ORDER Releasing Angelica Monique Madueno. (ecf)
|
|
| 9 | 9 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler: Initial Appearance as to Angelica Monique Madueno (2) held on 5/2/2022. Defendant consents to proceed via VTC. Appointed attorney Robert Llewellyn Swain(n/a) provisionally. Financial Affidavit due by 5/12/22. Detention Hearing as to Angelica Monique Madueno held on 5/2/2022. USA oral motion for detention(Flight); motion denied as to Angelica Monique Madueno. Bond set as to Angelica Monique Madueno (2) $15,000 PS secured by 1 FRRA. Abstract issued 5/2/22. Bond packet due by 5/9/22 or defendant to self surrender to USMS by noon on 5/9/22. Defense counsel to file motion to dismiss. Rule 5 advisement provided. ( Preliminary Hearing set for 5/12/22 at 9:00am before Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo. Arraignment set for 5/26/22 at 9:00am before Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo..) (CD# 5/2/2022 AGS 22-1:4:49-5:42). (Plaintiff Attorney Badih Mouannes AUSA). (Defendant Attorney Daniell Lee FD-S/A). (aje) | |
| 13 | 13
2
pgs
ORDER as to Fernando Valdemar Ortiz: The Court orders the United States to comply with the continuing duty to disclose evidence which is favorable to the defendant as required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny. Upon finding that the government has failed to comply with this order, the Court may, as appropriate, order the production of such information, grant a continuance, impose evidentiary sanctions, or, in extreme cases, dismiss charges.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 5/2/22. (aje)
|
|
| 14 | 14
2
pgs
ORDER as to Angelica Monique Madueno: The Court orders the United States to comply with the continuing duty to disclose evidence which is favorable to the defendant as required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny. Upon finding that the government has failed to comply with this order, the Court may, as appropriate, order the production of such information, grant a continuance, impose evidentiary sanctions, or, in extreme cases, dismiss charges.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 5/2/22. (aje)
|
|