Basurto et al v. Lenox Coffee LLC et al
| New York Southern District Court | |
| Judge: | Arun Subramanian |
| Referred: | James L Cott |
| Case #: | 1:22-cv-06915 |
| Nature of Suit | 710 Labor - Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Cause | 29:201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
| Case Filed: | Aug 15, 2022 |
| Re-opened: | May 17, 2024 |
| Terminated: | Jul 15, 2024 |
| Last checked: Saturday Feb 11, 2023 12:43 PM EST |
|
Defendant
Lenox Coffee LLC
|
|
|
Defendant
Monica Prado
|
|
|
Defendant
Rosa Prado
|
|
|
Defendant
Arturo Viramontes
|
|
|
Plaintiff
Margarito Basurto
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 05/18/2025 11:59 PM EDT |
| Monday, July 15, 2024 | ||
| 69 | 69
order
Stipulation and Order of Voluntary Dismissal
Mon 07/15 2:23 PM
STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii): It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) Arturo Viramontes pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.The parties have certified that there is no settlement between plaintiff and Arturo Viramontes. Dkt. 63. As such, the Court will accept this stipulation of dismissal. See Bailes v. Halo Media, LL C, 2023 WL 5606139, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 30, 2023) ("[T]he Court will accept a stipulation of dismissal under Rule 4l (a)(l )(A), so long as (1) the parties' stipulation of dismissal dismisses claims arising under the FLSA without prejudice and (2) the parties certify that there has been no settlement of FLSA claims."). The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Arun Subramanian on 7/15/2024) (sgz) |
|
| 68 | 68
misc
Letter
Mon 07/15 9:27 AM
LETTER addressed to Judge Arun Subramanian from Amy Gina Kim dated 07/15/2024 re: Stipulated Dismissal of Defendant Arturo Viramontes. Document filed by Margarito Basurto(individually), Margarito Basurto(on behalf of others similarly situated)..(Kim, Amy) |
|
| Thursday, July 11, 2024 | ||
| 67 | 67
1
pgs
order
Order
Thu 07/11 12:56 PM
ORDER: On July 1, 2024, the Court entered the parties' proposed judgment. However, the proposed judgment did not mention or enter judgment against defendant Arturo Viramontes. If that was a mistake, the parties should file an amended proposed judgment by July 17, 2024, and the Court will vacate the previous judgment. If that was not a mistake and plaintiffs intend to proceed against defendant Viramontes, they should file a letter by July 17, 2024, indicating the next steps for this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Arun Subramanian on 7/11/2024) (vfr) |
|