Justin S. Beck v. State of California et al
California Southern District Court | |
Judge: | Andrew G Schopler |
Referred: | David D Leshner |
Case #: | 3:23-cv-00164 |
Nature of Suit | 470 Other Statutes - Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
Cause | 18:1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act |
Case Filed: | Jan 30, 2023 |
Re-opened: | Sep 21, 2023 |
Terminated: | Feb 26, 2024 |
Last checked: Saturday Jul 29, 2023 2:27 AM PDT |
Defendant
Kenneth Catanzarite
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Ruben Duran
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Suzanne Grandt
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Eli David Morgenstern
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
State of California
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
The State Bar of California
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
United States Attorney General, -
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
United States of America
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Justin S. Beck
3501 Roselle St.
Oceanside, CA 92056 |
Docket last updated: 05/09/2025 11:59 PM PDT |
Thursday, March 14, 2024 | ||
67 | 67
![]() USCA Time Schedule Order as to65 Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit, filed by Justin S. Beck. (NOTICE TO PARTIES of deadlines regarding appellate transcripts: Appellant shall file transcript designation and ordering form with the US District Court, provide a copy of the form to the court reporter, and make payment arrangements with the court reporter on or by 4/10/2024 (see Ninth Circuit Rule 10-3.1); Due date for filing of transcripts in US District Court is 5/10/2024.) (cc: Court Reporter). (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mjw) |
|
66 | 66
![]() USCA Case Number 24-1520 for65 Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit, filed by Justin S. Beck.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mjw) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Att: 2
![]() |
||
Att: 3
![]() |
||
Tuesday, March 12, 2024 | ||
64 | 64
![]() CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: Plaintiffs generally have no right to maintain two separate actions involving the same subject matter at the same time in the same court and against the same defendant. Mendoza v. Amalgamated Transit Union Intl, 30 F.4th 879, 886 (9th Cir. 2022) (quotation marks omitted). Accordingly, plaintiff Justin Becks complaint must be dismissed. Consequently, Becks second amended complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as duplicative. And all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jms) |
|
Monday, March 11, 2024 | ||
65 | 65
![]() NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit as to61 Order Dismissing Case, by Justin S. Beck. (Filing fee $ 605. Receipt No 152002) (Notice of Appeal electronically transmitted to US Court of Appeals.)(dim) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Thursday, March 07, 2024 | ||
63 | 63
order
Order on Motion for Judgment
Thu 03/07 8:12 AM
MINUTE ORDER (AGS): In light of this Court's order dismissing the case (ECF61 ), defendants' motion for entry of judgment (ECF62 ) is granted. The clerk is directed to issue a judgment in favor of defendants. Signed by District Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 3/7/2024. (no document attached) (smf) |