USA v. O'Hanlon et al
| Florida Southern District Court | |
| Case #: | 1:23-mj-02653 |
| Case Filed: | Apr 04, 2023 |
| Terminated: | Apr 18, 2023 |
| Last checked: Wednesday Apr 05, 2023 3:30 AM EDT |
|
Defendant
William O'Hanlon (1)
|
|
|
Defendant
Karen Stefanowski (2)
|
|
|
Plaintiff
USA
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 08/05/2023 1:04 PM EDT |
| Tuesday, April 04, 2023 | ||
| 1 | 1
48
pgs
Magistrate Judge Removal of Indictment from District of New Jersey Case number in the other District 23-257(KMW) as to William O'Hanlon (1), Karen Stefanowski (2). (dgj)
|
|
| 2 | 2
1
pgs
Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis: Initial Appearance in Rule 5(c)(3)/Rule 40 Proceedings as to Karen Stefanowski held on 4/4/2023. Defendant advised of rights and charges. No attorney in Court; Defendant to retain counsel. Bond recommendation/set: Karen Stefanowski (2) The Court enters the agreed $200K w/10% to be deposited by Friday at noon . Date of Arrest or Surrender: 4/4/2023. Defendant to appear for her I/A in the District of New Jersey before Judge King. Removal Hearing and Report Re: Counsel Hearing set for 4/18/2023 10:00 AM in Miami Division before MIA Duty Magistrate Judge. (Digital 14:23:27) Signed by Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis on 4/4/2023. (kan)
|
|
| 3 | 3
1
pgs
Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis: Initial Appearance in Rule 5(c)(3)/Rule 40 Proceedings as to William O'Hanlon held on 4/4/2023. Defendant advised of rights and charges. No attorney in Court; Defendant to retain counsel. Bond recommendation/set: William O'Hanlon (1) The Court enters the agreed $200K with 10% to be deposited by Friday at noon . Date of Arrest or Surrender: 4/4/2023. Defendant to appear for his I/A in District of New Jersey before Judge King. (Digital 14:23:27) It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act, the Court confirms the United States obligation to disclose to the defendant all exculpatory evidence- that is, evidence that favors the defendant or casts doubt on the United States case, as required by Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny, and ORDERS the United States to do so. The government has a duty to disclose any evidence that goes to negating the defendants guilt, the credibility of a witness, or that would reduce a potential sentence. The defendant is entitled to this information without a request. Failure to disclose exculpatory evidence in a timely manner may result in consequences, including, but not limited to, exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, disciplinary action, or sanctions by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis on 4/4/2023. (kan) (Main Document 3 replaced on 4/6/2023) (aw).
|
|