Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, LTD. v. Austin Knudsen
Original Case: 6:23-cv-00048
| Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals | |
| Case #: | 0:23-cv-35494 |
| Type | civil / private |
| Nature of Suit | 440 Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights |
| Case Filed: | Jul 21, 2023 |
| Terminated: | Jun 14, 2024 |
| Last checked: Tuesday Jun 18, 2024 2:07 AM PDT |
|
Defendant - Appellee
AUSTIN KNUDSEN, in his official capacity, Attorney General of the State of Montana
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellant
GRAND RIVER ENTERPRISES SIX NATIONS, LTD.
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 06/18/2024 2:05 AM PDT |
| Friday, July 21, 2023 | ||
| 1 | 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: to be set. Preliminary Injunction Appeal. C.R. 3-3. [12759420] (RT) [Entered: 07/21/2023 10:53 AM] | |
Att: 1
1 pgs
Docketing Letter
|
||
|
Att: 2
2 pgs
Notice to All Parties and Counsel
|
||
|
Att: 3
1 pgs
Mediation Letter
|
||
|
Att: 4
2 pgs
Mediation Questionnaire
|
||
|
Att: 5
22 pgs
Case Opening Packet
|
||
| 2 | 2
2
pgs
Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 will apply to this appeal. The mediation questionnaire is due three days after the date of this order. If they have not already done so, within 7 calendar days after the filing date of this order, the parties shall make arrangements to obtain from the court reporter an official transcript of proceedings in the district court that will be included in the record on appeal. The opening brief and excerpts of record are due no later than August 17, 2023. The answering brief is due September 14, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. See 9th Cir. R. 3-3(b). In addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in their briefs, the parties must address the basis for this court’s jurisdiction over this appeal. See Religious Tech. Ctr., Church of Scientology Int’l, Inc. v. Scott, 869 F.2d 1306, 1308 (9th Cir. 1989) (“Ordinarily, an appeal does not lie from the denial of an application for a temporary restraining order.”); see also Bennett v. Medtronic, Inc., 285 F.3d 801, 804 (9th Cir. 2002) (“Ordinarily, temporary restraining orders, in contrast to preliminary injunctions, are not appealable.”) No streamlined extensions of time will be approved. See 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(a)(3). Any request for an extension of time to file a brief must be made by written motion under Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(b). Failure to file timely the opening brief will result in the automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [12759681] (AF) [Entered: 07/21/2023 02:37 PM]
|
|