Touro University v. FARKAS
| New York Southern District Court | |
| Judge: | Cathy Seibel |
| Referred: | Andrew E Krause |
| Case #: | 7:24-cv-00116 |
| Nature of Suit | 880 Civil Rights - Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 (DTSA) |
| Cause | 18:1836(a) Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets |
| Case Filed: | Jan 05, 2024 |
| Last checked: Monday Feb 19, 2024 3:54 AM EST |
|
Defendant
Edward F. Farkas
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
Touro University
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 1 hours ago |
| Friday, May 03, 2024 | ||
| 74 | 74
misc
Letter
Fri 05/03 5:56 PM
LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause from Mariah Passarelli on behalf of all Parties dated May 3, 2024 re: CONFIRMATION THAT THE PARTIES HAVE AGREED ON SEARCH TERMS. Document filed by Touro University..(Sued Agresti, Janice) |
|
| Thursday, May 02, 2024 | ||
| 73 | 73
order
Protective Order
Thu 05/02 10:43 AM
CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material...SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause on 5/2/2024) (vfr) |
|
| Wednesday, May 01, 2024 | ||
| 72 | 72
misc
Proposed Protective Order
Wed 05/01 4:04 PM
PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Document filed by Touro University..(Sued Agresti, Janice) |
|
|
Att: 1
Exhibit A,
|
||
|
Att: 2
Exhibit B
|
||
| 71 | 71
order
Stipulation and Order
Wed 05/01 12:20 PM
JOINT PROTOCOL FOR DISCOVERY AND PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND PAPER DOCUMENTS: The Parties to the above-captioned action HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE, by and through their undersigned counsel, that the following specifications shall govern discovery of all documents, electronically stored information ("ESI"), and any other materials and information produced by the Parties in discovery in the above-captioned action. As further set forth by this Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause on 5/1/2024) (tg) |
|
| Tuesday, April 30, 2024 | ||
| 70 | 70
order
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File
Tue 04/30 5:55 PM
ORDER granting in part and denying in part69 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. The motion for extension of time to agree to search terms is GRANTED. The parties must agree to search terms and submit a letter confirming the same by Friday, May 3, 2024. The Court will not enter the Proposed Protective Order as submitted. Per Judge Krause's Individual Practices Rule 2.B., "[i]n cases where confidential information will be exchanged, the parties must use Judge Krauses model Confidentiality Stipulation and Proposed Protective Order. The parties may apply for a protective order that differs from the model by submitting a letter via ECF and attaching the proposed order, showing in a blackline comparison how the proposed order differs from the Courts model. The letter must explain why the modifications are needed and note any disagreements between the parties regarding the modifications from the Courts model." The parties are directed to refile the Proposed Protective Order for the Court's consideration in accordance with this rule. (HEREBY ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause)(Text Only Order) (dpm) |
|
| Monday, April 29, 2024 | ||
| 69 | 69
motion
Extension of Time to File Document
Mon 04/29 7:22 PM
FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Search Terms Related to ESI Protocol addressed to Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause from Touro University and Dr. Farkas dated April 29, 2024. Document filed by Touro University..(Sued Agresti, Janice) |
|
|
Att: 1
Exhibit A - Protective Order,
|
||
|
Att: 2
Exhibit B - ESI Protocol
|
||