Morrill v. Aarhaus et al
| Colorado District Court | |
| Judge: | Philip A Brimmer |
| Case #: | 1:24-cv-00199 |
| Nature of Suit | 440 Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights |
| Cause | 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Case Filed: | Jan 23, 2024 |
| Last checked: Sunday Jul 21, 2024 3:56 AM MDT |
|
Defendant
Alyssa Aarhaus
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Charles Beatty
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Jason Byrnes
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Kelsie McCallum
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Bren Rogers
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Virginia Usher
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
David Morrill
[E-filer effective 1/25/2024] 7232 Braun Court
Arvada, CO 80005 |
GPO
Nov 26 2024
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella on 26 November 2024. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint 41 be GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's claims be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (cmadr, ) |
|
|
GPO
Mar 14 2025
mplaint on or before April 14, 2025.(dgumb, ) Modified on 3/14/2025 to edit text (dgumb, ). ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/14/2025, re: 59 Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is ACCEPTED. ORDERED that Plaintiff's Objection to Court's Recommendation to Dismiss Amended Complaint is OVERRULED [Docket No. 60] and Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint [Docket No. 60] is DENIED. ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint [Docket No. 41] is GRANTED. ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Correct Objection to Court's Recommendation [Docket No. 61] is DENIED. ORDERED that all of plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. ORDERED that plaintiff David Morrill may file a motion for leave to file an amended co |
| Docket last updated: 1 hours ago |
| Friday, April 11, 2025 | ||
| 67 | 67
order
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File
Fri 04/11 2:37 PM
ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 4/11/2025 re:66 the letter from plaintiff's counsel, construed as a motion for an extension time to file a motion for leave to file an amended complaint, is GRANTED . Plaintiff may file a motion for leave to file an amended complaint on or before May 14, 2025 . Counsel is reminded that future requests for relief shall be submitted in the form of a motion that complies with § III of the Court's Practice Standards. See Practice Standards (Civil Cases), Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer, § III. Text Only Entry(pabsec, ) |
|
| 66 | 66
motion
Extension of Time
Fri 04/11 1:06 PM
First MOTION for Extension of Time to file motion for leave to file Amended Complaint by Plaintiff David Morrill. (Sullivan, Richard) |
|
| 65 | 65
misc
Advisory Attorney Noncompliance 2
Fri 04/11 8:26 AM
ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re:64 Notice of Entry of Appearance filed by attorney Richard L. Sullivan. Attorney or pro se has used an incorrect signature format in violation of D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(a) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. In the future, the filer must affix an electronic s/signature and s/followed by a typed, not an inked, signature to all future documents. Also, the document was scanned and not converted directly to portable document format (PDF). (Text Only Entry) (dgumb, ) |
|
| Thursday, April 10, 2025 | ||
| 64 | 64
notice
Notice of Entry of Appearance
Thu 04/10 11:46 AM
NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Richard L. Sullivan on behalf of David MorrillAttorney Richard L. Sullivan added to party David Morrill(pty:pla) (Sullivan, Richard) |
|