Susan McMasters v. Restaurant Brands International Inc, et al
Original Case: 2:20-cv-00791
Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals | |
Case #: | 0:24-cv-01701 |
Type | civil / private / civil rights |
Nature of Suit | 445 Civil Rights - Amer w/Disabilities-Employment |
Case Filed: | Apr 18, 2024 |
Last checked: Friday Apr 19, 2024 4:28 AM EDT |
Defendant - Appellee
RESTAURANT BRANDS INTERNATIONAL INC, trading and doing business as BURGER KING
|
Represented By
|
Defendant - Appellee
CARROLS LLC BK, trading and doing business as BURGER KING
|
Represented By
|
Defendant - Appellee
CARROLS BK CORP, trading and doing business as BURGER KING
|
Represented By
|
Defendant - Appellee
CARROLS LLC, trading and doing business as BURGER KING
|
Represented By
|
Defendant - Appellee
CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP INC, trading and doing business as BURGER KING
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff - Appellant
SUSAN MCMASTERS, individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Baby Doe
|
Represented By
|
Docket last updated: 04/19/2024 4:28 AM EDT |
Thursday, April 18, 2024 | ||
RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (TMM) | ||
CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Susan McMasters in District Court No. 2-20-cv-00791. (TMM) | ||
Att: 1 48 pgs Civil Case Docketed | ||
Att: 2 9 pgs DC Opinion 3/19/24 | ||
Att: 3 1 pgs DC Order 3/19/24 | ||
Att: 4 2 pgs DC Order a 3/19/24 | ||
Att: 5 1 pgs DC Order b 3/19/24 | ||
Att: 6 1 pgs caption | ||
Att: 7 2 pgs Case Opening Letter | ||
1 pgs NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (TMM) | ||
1 pgs CLERK ORDER The actions at Nos. 23-2764 and 24-1701 are hereby consolidated for all purposes. Appeal No. 23-2764 will not be listed for dismissal at this time. All responses filed by the parties regarding the jurisdictional issue are referred to the merits panel. This does not in any way signify that a determination of jurisdiction has been made. Only the Court can make such a decision. The parties are directed to address this Court's jurisdiction in their briefs. 23-2764 24-1701 (TMM) |