Negrete-Neal v. Luraschi et al
Tennessee Western District Court | |
Judge: | Thomas L Parker |
Referred: | Annie T Christoff |
Case #: | 2:24-cv-02285 |
Nature of Suit | 290 Real Property - All Other Real Property |
Cause | 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
Case Filed: | May 01, 2024 |
Last checked: Monday Jan 20, 2025 11:33 PM CST |
Defendant
Apperson Crump, PLC
|
|
Defendant
Estate of John Bellisomi
|
|
Defendant
Estate of Louis Lenti
|
|
Defendant
Timothy Ginski
|
|
Defendant
Anthony Luraschi
|
|
Defendant
Elevia Luraschi
|
|
Defendant
Eugene Ori
|
|
Defendant
Jean Marie Ori
|
|
Defendant
Richard W. Periotti
|
|
Plaintiff
Rheta Negrete-Neal
6305 Highland Knolls Drive
Bakersfield, CA 93306 |
Docket last updated: 5 hours ago |
Monday, April 28, 2025 | ||
37 | 37
![]() Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Rheta Negrete-Neal. (jae) |
|
Friday, April 25, 2025 | ||
36 | 36
![]() RESPONSE in Opposition re33 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (proposed order submitted) ,35 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Rheta Negrete-Neal. (jae) |
|
Friday, April 11, 2025 | ||
35 | 35
![]() MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Apperson Crump, PLC.(Vescovo, Stephen) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Thursday, April 10, 2025 | ||
34 | 34
![]() NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen W. Vescovo on behalf of Apperson Crump, PLC (Vescovo, Stephen) |
|
Monday, April 07, 2025 | ||
33 | 33
![]() MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (proposed order submitted) by Jean Marie Ori. (Prueter, Charles) |
|
Friday, April 04, 2025 | ||
32 | 32
order
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer
Fri 04/04 3:05 PM
TEXT-ONLY ORDER GRANTING29 SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Though the Motion's Certificate of Consultation does not reflect whether the Motion is opposed, in the interest of judicial economy, the Court will consider the Motion now. For good cause shown, the Motion is GRANTED. Defendant Apperson Crump's deadline to respond to the Complaint is now April 11, 2025. No further extensions of time will be permitted absent a showing of good cause. Signed by Magistrate Judge Annie T. Christoff on 04/04/2025. (jad) |
|
31 | 31
![]() RESPONSE in Opposition re25 MOTION MOTION FOR AN ORDER PERMITTING PLAINTIFFS TO SERVE DEFENDANTS GINSKI AND PIEROTTI BY PUBLICATION filed by Timothy Ginski. (Ray, Jonathan) |
|
30 | 30
![]() REPLY to Response to Motion re24 Response in Opposition to Motion filed by Timothy Ginski.(Ray, Jonathan) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Wednesday, April 02, 2025 | ||
29 | 29
![]() Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer proposed order submitted by Apperson Crump, PLC. (Smith, Bruce) |
|
Tuesday, March 25, 2025 | ||
28 | 28
order
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply
Tue 03/25 7:11 PM
TEXT-ONLY ORDER GRANTING27 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Though the Motion's Certificate of Consultation does not reflect whether the Motion is opposed, in the interest of judicial economy, the Court will consider the Motion now. For good cause shown, the Motion is GRANTED. Defendant Apperson Crump's deadline to respond to the Complaint is now April 2, 2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Annie T. Christoff on 03/25/2025. (jad) |
|
Monday, March 24, 2025 | ||
27 | 27
![]() Proposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Apperson Crump, PLC. (Smith, Bruce) |
|
26 | 26
![]() Summons Issued as to Estate of John Bellisomi. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (cmm) |
|
25 | 25
![]() MOTION FOR AN ORDER PERMITTING PLAINTIFFS TO SERVE DEFENDANTS GINSKI AND PIEROTTI BY PUBLICATION by Rheta Negrete-Neal. (cmm) |
|
Friday, March 21, 2025 | ||
24 | 24
![]() PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE in Opposition re21 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Rheta Negrete-Neal. (cmm) |
|
Thursday, March 20, 2025 | ||
23 | 23
![]() SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rheta Negrete-Neal as to Estate of Louis Lenti and Jean Marie Ori. (mf) |
|
Monday, March 03, 2025 | ||
22 | 22
![]() ORDER REQUIRING SERVICE OF PROCESS ON THE UNSERVED DEFENDANTS AND DIRECTING APPERSON CRUMP TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT. Responses due by 03/24/2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Annie T. Christoff on 03/03/2025. (jad) |
|
Monday, February 17, 2025 | ||
21 | 21
![]() First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Timothy Ginski.(Ray, Jonathan) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Att: 2
![]() |
||
Att: 3
![]() |
||
Friday, February 07, 2025 | ||
20 | 20
![]() First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Elevia Luraschi. (Whitlock, Derek) |
|
Friday, January 31, 2025 | ||
19 | 19
![]() First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Anthony Luraschi. (Whitlock, Derek) |
|
Wednesday, January 29, 2025 | ||
18 | 18
order
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer
Wed 01/29 11:49 AM
TEXT-ONLY ORDER GRANTING15 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING. Though the Motion's Certificate of Consultation does not reflect whether the Motion is opposed, in the interest of judicial economy, the Court will consider the Motion now. For good cause shown, the Motion is GRANTED. Defendant Timothy Ginski's deadline to respond to the Complaint is now February 17, 2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Annie T. Christoff on 01/29/2025. (jad) |
|
Tuesday, January 28, 2025 | ||
17 | 17
![]() CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Rheta Negrete-Neal on Richard Pieriotti (jae) |
|
Monday, January 27, 2025 | ||
16 | 16
![]() CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Rheta Negrete-Neal service on Elevia Luraschi. (jae) |
|
15 | 15
![]() First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re1 Pro Se Complaint proposed order submitted by Timothy Ginski. (Ray, Jonathan) |
|
14 | 14
![]() NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Conner Ray on behalf of Timothy Ginski (Ray, Jonathan) |
|
Tuesday, January 14, 2025 | ||
13 | 13
![]() CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Rheta Negrete-Neal (jae) |
|
Tuesday, January 07, 2025 | ||
12 | 12
![]() CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Rheta Negrete-Neal on Apperson Crump. (jae) |
|
Thursday, December 12, 2024 | ||
11 | 11
![]() ORDER GRANTING FINAL EXTENSION OF TIME TO EFFECTUATE SERVICE OF PROCESS. Proof of Service due by 01/09/2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Annie T. Christoff on 12/12/2024. (jad) |
|
Thursday, December 05, 2024 | ||
9 | 9
![]() Summons Issued as to Apperson Crump, PLC, Estate of John Bellisomi, Estate of Louis Lenti, Timothy Ginski, Anthony Luraschi, Elevia Luraschi, Eugene Ori. The filer was emailed the issued summons for service.(jae) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Att: 2
![]() |
||
Att: 3
![]() |
||
Att: 4
![]() |
||
Att: 5
![]() |
||
Att: 6
![]() |
||
Thursday, October 24, 2024 | ||
8 | 8
![]() RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Rheta Negrete-Neal.(cdi) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Friday, October 04, 2024 | ||
7 | 7
![]() SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING SERVICE OF PROCESS. Show Cause Response due by 10/25/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Annie T. Christoff on 10/04/2024. (jad) |
|
Tuesday, August 27, 2024 | ||
6 | 6
![]() ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 09/24/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Annie T. Christoff on 08/27/2024. (jad) |
|
Wednesday, May 01, 2024 | ||
5 | 5
notice
ADR Compliance
Wed 05/01 4:20 PM
NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (csf) |
|
4 | 4
notice
Notice LR 72.1 - Right to Consent to Jurisdiction by Magistrate Judge
Wed 05/01 4:20 PM
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (csf) |
|
3 | 3
notice
Notice LR 16.2
Wed 05/01 4:19 PM
NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf) |
|
2 | 2
![]() Case initiation fee: PAID $ 405.00, receipt number 200003992 (csf) |
|
1 | 1
![]() PRO SE COMPLAINT for a Civil Case against All Defendants, filed by Rheta Negrete-Neal.(csf) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
misc
Clerks Referral to Magistrate Judge
Wed 05/01 4:32 PM
Pursuant to Administrative Order 2013-05, this case has been assigned to the United States magistrate judge for management of all pretrial matters. Pursuant to Local Rule 4.1(b)(1), the plaintiff shall present the Clerk with a properly completed summons for each defendant, and the Clerk shall issue the summons(es) to the plaintiff for service on the defendant(s). (csf) |