USA v. Montalvo
| California Southern District Court | |
| Case #: | 2:24-mj-08533 |
| Case Filed: | Jun 14, 2024 |
| Terminated: | Jun 20, 2024 |
| Last checked: Sunday Jul 14, 2024 12:34 AM PDT |
|
Plaintiff
USA
|
Represented By
|
| TERMINATED PARTIES | |
|
Defendant
Ashley Cynthia Montalvo (1)
Terminated: 06/20/2024
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 07/14/2024 1:22 AM PDT |
| Thursday, June 13, 2024 | ||
| Arrest of Ashley Cynthia Montalvo (no document attached) (cxl) | ||
| Friday, June 14, 2024 | ||
| 1 | 1
OUT OF DISTRICT COMPLAINT as to Ashley Cynthia Montalvo. (Copies provided to Counsel in Court). Initial Appearance - ODC set for 6/14/2024 before Magistrate Judge Lupe Rodriguez Jr.. (cxl)
|
|
| 2 | 2 ***English. No Interpreter needed as to Ashley Cynthia Montalvo (no document attached) (cxl) | |
| 3 | 3 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Lupe Rodriguez, Jr: Initial Appearance - Out of District Complaint as to Ashley Cynthia Montalvo held on 6/14/2024. Proffer, Federal Defenders appointed for Ashley Cynthia Montalvo. USA;s oral motion to detain. Detention Hearing - RF set for 6/20/2024 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Lupe Rodriguez Jr.. Removal/ID Hearing set for 6/27/2024 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Lupe Rodriguez Jr.. As required by Rule 5(f), the US is ordered to produce all exculpatory evidence to the defendant pursuant to Brady v. Maryland and its progeny. Not doing so in a timely manner may result in sanctions, including exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges and contempt proceedings.(CD# 6/14/2024 LR2024 12:25-12:29). (Plaintiff Attorney Daniel Casillas). (Defendant Attorney James Johnson). (no document attached) (cxl) | |
| 4 | 4 ORAL MOTION to Detain by USA as to Ashley Cynthia Montalvo. (no document attached) (cxl) | |
| 5 | 5
ORDER as to Ashley Cynthia Montalvo: The Court orders the United States to comply with the continuing duty to disclose evidence which is favorable to the defendant as required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny. Upon finding that the government has failed to comply with this order, the Court may, as appropriate, order the production of such information, grant a continuance, impose evidentiary sanctions, or, in extreme cases, dismiss charges.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lupe Rodriguez, Jr on 6/14/2024. (cxl)
|
|