Crosby v. Harborview Decatur LLC
| Georgia Northern District Court | |
| Judge: | Steven D Grimberg |
| Referred: | Justin S Anand |
| Case #: | 1:24-cv-03197 |
| Nature of Suit | 442 Civil Rights - Employment |
| Cause | 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
| Case Filed: | Jul 19, 2024 |
| Case in other court: | Superior Court of Dekalb County, 24CV6025 |
| Last checked: Wednesday Jan 15, 2025 4:09 AM EST |
|
Defendant
Harborview Decatur LLC
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
Tabatha Nicole Crosby
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 2 hours ago |
| Wednesday, May 07, 2025 | ||
| 52 | 52
discov
Certificate of Service
Wed 05/07 12:38 PM
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Defendant Harborview Decatur, LLC's Supplemental Production of Documents, Bates labeled, Harborview 1980 through Harborview 3781 by Harborview Decatur LLC.(Myers, Kimberly) |
|
| Tuesday, May 06, 2025 | ||
| 51 | 51
2
pgs
order
Order for Service of Report and Recommendation
Tue 05/06 3:45 PM
ORDER for Service of50 Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 5/6/2025. (tas) |
|
| 50 | 50
motion
Report and Recommendation
Tue 05/06 3:41 PM
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that43 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint With Prejudice Or, Alternatively, Disqualify Plaintiffs Counsel, And Motion To Exclude Plaintiffs Use Of Deposition Testimony Of Kierica Colbert filed by Harborview Decatur LLC be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 5/6/2025. (tas) |
|
|
order
Order ~Util - Set Deadlines/Hearings
Tue 05/06 3:45 PM
ORDER that Plaintiff is to provide supplemental discovery responses, as described in50 Report and Recommendation, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Report and Recommendation, and allows Defendant to re-raise any issues, as necessary, based on those supplemental responses, as further explained herein. Court no longer perceives any need for an ongoing stay of discovery. Although discovery had expired by the time the stay was requested, the Court understands that both parties need limited additional time after the resolution of the Motion. Accordingly, the Court extends discovery for a limited period of thirty (30) days. This discovery period will begin fourteen (14) days from the date of this Report and Recommendation. Thus, the discovery deadline, absent further order, is 6/19/2025. All deadlines running from the end of discovery shall run from this date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 5/6/2025. (tas) |
||