Morrissey v. A&E Television Networks, LLC et al
| New York Southern District Court | |
| Judge: | Ronnie Abrams |
| Referred: | Stewart D Aaron |
| Case #: | 1:24-cv-07856 |
| Nature of Suit | 840 Property Rights - Trademark |
| Cause | 15:1125la Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Case Filed: | Oct 16, 2024 |
| Terminated: | Aug 07, 2026 |
| Case in other court: | New York Supreme Court, New York County, 650893/2024 |
| Last checked: Monday Apr 14, 2025 4:34 AM EDT |
|
Counter Claimant
A&E Television Networks, LLC
|
Represented By
|
|
Counter Claimant
Creature Films, Inc.
|
Represented By
|
|
Counter Claimant
Entertainment One Reality Productions, LLC
|
Represented By
|
|
Counter Claimant
Mark Ford
|
Represented By
|
|
Counter Claimant
Lifetime Entertainment Services, LLC
|
Represented By
|
|
Counter Claimant
Sabrina E. Morrissey
|
Represented By
|
|
Counter Defendant
Sabrina E. Morrissey
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
A&E Television Networks, LLC
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Creature Films, Inc.
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Entertainment One Reality Productions, LLC
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Mark Ford
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Lifetime Entertainment Services, LLC
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
Sabrina E. Morrissey
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 6 hours ago |
| Friday, August 07, 2026 | ||
| 111 | 111
AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - CASE TERMINATED - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 15 U.S.C. 1116, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a final decision was rendered on 8/7/2026 in a court action filed on the following trademark(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)..(ar) |
|
| 110 | 110
ORDER: The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 8/7/2026) (ar) |
|
| 109 | 109
ORDER granting102 Letter Motion to Seal. Application granted. Not only has the Second Circuit described the presumption of public access for settlement and related materials as "weak," Gambale v. Deutsche Bank AG, 377 F.3d 133, 144 (2d Cir. 2004), but given the highly confidential and sensitive health of other private information contained within the settlement agreement and related materials here, the Court agrees that sealing appropriate. See Gutierrez v. Dubois, 2020 WL 3072242, *10 (S.D.N.Y. June 10, 2020) (sealing medication records because the "presumption of access is outweighed...by Petitioner's considerable privacy interest in his medical privacy interest in sensitive medical documents); Schoeps v. Museum of Modern Art, 603 F.Supp.273, 676 n.2 )S.D.N.Y. 2009)(collecting cases standing for the proposition that "the presumption of public access is weak when settlement confidentiality is concerned"). For the same reasons, the Court has also sealed the transcript of the hearing held today concerning the parties' joint motion for approval of the settlement agreement. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 8/7/2026) (ks) (Main Document 109 replaced on 8/7/2026) (ks) |
|
| 108 | 108
ORDER granting103 Motion to Approve. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED pursuant to Local Rule 83.2(a) that the proposed settlement of this matter is approved, including the Settlement Agreement, the proposed attorneys' fees and costs to be paid to Plaintiff's Counsel, and the proposed distribution of any settlement payment. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 8/7/2026) (ks) |
|
|
minutes
Status Conference
Fri 08/07 11:58 AM
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Ronnie Abrams: Status Conference held on 8/7/2026. (Court Reporter Doug Colavito) (arc) |
||
|
utility
Case Stay Lifted
Fri 08/07 6:21 PM
Case Stay Lifted. (ar) |
||