|
GPO
Feb 20 2025
ORDER granting 28 Motion to Continue Trial as to Harold Helm. Jury Trial, for both defendants, is continued to 5/19/2025 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 4, Roman L. Hruska Federal Courthouse, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, NE before Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter Jr. The time between today's date and the anticipated trial is excluded for purposes of computing the limits under the Speedy Trial Act. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (MLR)ORDER granting 28 Motion to Continue Trial as to Harold Helm. Jury Trial, for both defendants, is continued to 5/19/2025 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 4, Roman L. Hruska Federal Courthouse, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, NE before Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter Jr. The time between today's date and the anticipated trial is excluded for purposes of computing the limits under the Speedy Trial Act. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (MLR)
|
|
GPO
May 08 2025
ORDER as to Lindsay Helm. IT IS ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial (Filing No. 32) is granted as follows: The jury trial, for both defendants, now set for May 19, 2025, is continued to June 23, 2025. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between todays date and June 23, 2025, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(6), (7)(A) & (B)(iv). The Court construes the Entry of Appearance (Filing No. 31) as a motion to continue and denies as moot. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (MLR)ORDER as to Lindsay Helm. IT IS ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial (Filing No. 32) is granted as follows: The jury trial, for both defendants, now set for May 19, 2025, is continued to June 23, 2025. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between todays date and June 23, 2025, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(6), (7)(A) & (B)(iv). The Court construes the Entry of Appearance (Filing No. 31) as a motion to continue and denies as moot. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (MLR)
|