Stingray IP Solutions LLC v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
Texas Eastern District Court | |
Judge: | Rodney Gilstrap |
Referred: | Roy S Payne |
Case #: | 2:24-cv-00868 |
Nature of Suit | 830 Property Rights - Patent |
Cause | 15:1126 Patent Infringement |
Case Filed: | Oct 28, 2024 |
Last checked: Saturday Apr 26, 2025 3:45 AM CDT |
Defendant
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Stingray IP Solutions LLC
6136 Frisco Sq. Blvd. Suite 400
Frisco, TX 75034 |
Represented By
|
Docket last updated: 05/23/2025 11:59 PM CDT |
Tuesday, March 25, 2025 | ||
44 | 44
![]() SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response re23 OPPOSED MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Under 35 U.S.C. Section 101 filed by Stingray IP Solutions LLC . (Bragalone, Jeffrey) |
|
Tuesday, March 18, 2025 | ||
43 | 43
![]() ORDER granting42 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to41 Reply to Response to Motion Responses due by 3/25/2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 3/18/2025. (NKL) |
|
Monday, March 17, 2025 | ||
42 | 42
![]() UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to41 Reply to Response to Motion by Stingray IP Solutions LLC.(Saad, Terry) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Tuesday, March 11, 2025 | ||
41 | 41
![]() REPLY to Response re23 OPPOSED MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Under 35 U.S.C. Section 101 filed by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company . (Shelton, Barry) |
|
Wednesday, March 05, 2025 | ||
40 | 40
![]() NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company regarding Invalidity Contentions and Subject Matter Eligibility Contentions (Smith, Melissa) |
|
Monday, March 03, 2025 | ||
39 | 39
![]() ORDER granting38 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to23 OPPOSED MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Under 35 U.S.C. Section 101 Replies due by 3/11/2025.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 3/3/2025. (NKL) |
|
38 | 38
![]() UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to23 OPPOSED MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Under 35 U.S.C. Section 101 by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company.(Shelton, Barry) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Monday, February 24, 2025 | ||
37 | 37
![]() RESPONSE re23 OPPOSED MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Under 35 U.S.C. Section 101 filed by Stingray IP Solutions LLC .(Bragalone, Jeffrey) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Wednesday, February 19, 2025 | ||
36 | 36
![]() PROTECTIVE ORDER (Motion(s)35 terminated). Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 2/19/2025. (NKL) |
|
Tuesday, February 18, 2025 | ||
35 | 35
![]() JOINT MOTION for Protective Order by Stingray IP Solutions LLC.(Bragalone, Jeffrey) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Thursday, February 13, 2025 | ||
34 | 34
![]() ORDER granting32 Motion for Extension of Time to File Proposed Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 2/12/2025. (NKL) |
|
Tuesday, February 11, 2025 | ||
33 | 33
![]() NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE by Stingray IP Solutions LLC (Saad, Terry) |
|
32 | 32
![]() UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Proposed Protective Order by Stingray IP Solutions LLC.(Bragalone, Jeffrey) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Thursday, February 06, 2025 | ||
31 | 31
![]() DISCOVERY ORDER re28 Motion for Entry of Discovery Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 2/5/2025. (NKL) |
|
30 | 30
![]() DOCKET CONTROL ORDER re27 JOINT MOTION for Entry of Docket Control Order filed by Stingray IP Solutions LLC., Pretrial Conference set for 6/1/2026 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne., Jury Selection set for 7/6/2026 at 09:00AM before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap., Markman Hearing set for 1/16/2026 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (Motion(s)27 terminated). Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 2/5/2025. (NKL) |
|
29 | 29
![]() ORDER granting26 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to23 OPPOSED MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Under 35 U.S.C. Section 101 Responses due by 2/24/2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 2/5/2025. (NKL) |
|
Tuesday, February 04, 2025 | ||
28 | 28
![]() JOINT MOTION for Entry of Discovery Order by Stingray IP Solutions LLC.(Saad, Terry) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
27 | 27
![]() JOINT MOTION for Entry of Docket Control Order by Stingray IP Solutions LLC.(Saad, Terry) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
26 | 26
![]() UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to23 OPPOSED MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Under 35 U.S.C. Section 101 by Stingray IP Solutions LLC.(Saad, Terry) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Monday, February 03, 2025 | ||
25 | 25
![]() NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company re23 OPPOSED MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Under 35 U.S.C. Section 101 (Shelton, Barry) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Friday, January 24, 2025 | ||
24 | 24
![]() Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (Shelton, Barry) |
|
23 | 23
![]() OPPOSED MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Under 35 U.S.C. Section 101 by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company.(Shelton, Barry) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Att: 2
![]() |
||
Att: 3
![]() |
||
Att: 4
![]() |
||
Att: 5
![]() |
||
Tuesday, January 21, 2025 | ||
minutes
Scheduling Conference/Case Management Conference
Tue 01/28 3:26 PM
Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap: Scheduling Conference/Case Management Conference held on 1/21/2025 from 01:32 PM - 02:35 PM. Counsel for the parties appeared. Court asked whether the parties consented to trial before the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Court proceeded to provide counsel with Claim Construction and Jury Selection/Trial dates. (Court Reporter - Shawn McRoberts) (aeb) |
||
Friday, January 10, 2025 | ||
22 | 22
![]() FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, filed by Stingray IP Solutions LLC.(Bragalone, Jeffrey) |
|
Wednesday, January 08, 2025 | ||
21 | 21
![]() ORDER granting19 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re1 Complaint, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company answer due 1/13/2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 1/8/2025. (NKL) |
|
Tuesday, January 07, 2025 | ||
20 | 20
![]() NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE by Stingray IP Solutions LLC (Saad, Terry) |
|
Monday, January 06, 2025 | ||
19 | 19
![]() UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re1 Complaint, by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company.(Shelton, Barry) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Wednesday, December 18, 2024 | ||
18 | 18
text
Clerk's Entry re Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint
Wed 12/18 3:41 PM
Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company answer is now due 1/6/2025. (Text entry only, no document attached.)(NKL) |
|
17 | 17
![]() Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint filed by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. Summons originally served on 10/30/2024. Agreed new answer date is January 6, 2025.(Shelton, Barry) |
|
Wednesday, December 11, 2024 | ||
16 | 16
![]() NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Melissa Richards Smith on behalf of Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (Smith, Melissa) |
|
Tuesday, December 10, 2024 | ||
15 | 15
![]() ORDER Scheduling/Case Management Conference set for 1/21/2025 at 01:30 PM before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 12/9/24. (bga) |
|
Tuesday, November 12, 2024 | ||
14 | 14
![]() Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company.(Shelton, Barry) |
|
13 | 13
![]() NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Bradley Dalton Coburn on behalf of Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (Coburn, Bradley) |
|
12 | 12
![]() NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Barry Kenneth Shelton on behalf of Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (Shelton, Barry) |
|
text
Application Granted for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint
Tue 11/12 11:42 AM
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company to 12/20/2024. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.(NKL) |
||
Friday, November 01, 2024 | ||
11 | 11
![]() SUMMONS Returned Executed by Stingray IP Solutions LLC. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company served on 10/30/2024. (Bragalone, Jeffrey) |
|
10 | 10
![]() AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint for Patent Infringement served on Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company on 10/30/2024, filed by Stingray IP Solutions LLC. (Bragalone, Jeffrey) |
|
Wednesday, October 30, 2024 | ||
9 | 9
![]() NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Mark Douglass on behalf of Stingray IP Solutions LLC (Douglass, Mark) |
|
8 | 8
![]() NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Terry Afif Saad on behalf of Stingray IP Solutions LLC (Saad, Terry) |
|
7 | 7
![]() NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Marcus Benavides on behalf of Stingray IP Solutions LLC (Benavides, Marcus) |
|
6 | 6
![]() NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Brandon V. Zuniga on behalf of Stingray IP Solutions LLC (Zuniga, Brandon) |
|
Tuesday, October 29, 2024 | ||
5 | 5
![]() NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Andrea Leigh Fair on behalf of Stingray IP Solutions LLC (Fair, Andrea) |
|
4 | 4
![]() SUMMONS Issued as to Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company c/o C T Corporation System. (NKL) |
|
Monday, October 28, 2024 | ||
3 | 3
![]() Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Stingray IP Solutions LLC (Bragalone, Jeffrey) |
|
2 | 2
![]() Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Bragalone, Jeffrey) |
|
1 | 1
![]() COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10444850.), filed by Stingray IP Solutions LLC.(Bragalone, Jeffrey) (NKL) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
utility
Case Assigned/Reassigned
Mon 10/28 4:40 PM
Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (NKL) |
||
notice
Notice of Magistrate Judge Availability
Mon 10/28 4:40 PM
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form[LINK:Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge] is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge . (NKL) |