WU v. Mayorkas et al
New York Eastern District Court | |
Judge: | Eric R Komitee |
Case #: | 1:24-cv-08105 |
Nature of Suit | 465 Immigration - Other Immigration Actions |
Cause | 08:1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
Case Filed: | Nov 21, 2024 |
Terminated: | Dec 04, 2024 |
Last checked: Sunday Jan 05, 2025 4:14 AM EST |
Defendant
Michael Borgen
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Joseph Cardinale
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
US Attorney General Merrick Garland
US Department of Justice 950 Pennslvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530 |
Represented By
|
Defendant
USCIS Director Ur M. Jaddou
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Connie Nolan
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Christopher A. Wray
Director - F.B.I. 935 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20535 |
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Wengan Wu
|
Represented By
|
Docket last updated: 5 hours ago |
Wednesday, December 04, 2024 | ||
order
~Util - Terminate Civil Case
Wed 12/04 5:45 PM
Pursuant to the parties. Stipulation of Dismissal6 filed on December 3, 2024, this action is dismissed without prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and fees. The civil case is terminated. (APJ) |
||
Tuesday, December 03, 2024 | ||
6 | 6
![]() STIPULATION of Dismissal without prejudice by Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Connie Nolan, Michael Borgen, Joseph Cardinale, Merrick Garland, Christopher A. Wray (Lipari, Vincent) |
|
Monday, December 02, 2024 | ||
5 | 5
![]() SUMMONS Returned Executed by Wengan Wu. Michael Borgen served on 11/29/2024, answer due 1/28/2025; Joseph Cardinale served on 11/29/2024, answer due 1/28/2025; Merrick Garland served on 11/29/2024, answer due 1/28/2025; Ur M. Jaddou served on 11/29/2024, answer due 1/28/2025; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 11/29/2024, answer due 1/28/2025; Connie Nolan served on 11/29/2024, answer due 1/28/2025; Christopher A. Wray served on 11/29/2024, answer due 1/28/2025. (Zhang, Henry) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Att: 2
![]() |
||
Wednesday, November 27, 2024 | ||
4 | 4
![]() NOTICE of Appearance by Vincent Lipari on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Lipari, Vincent) |
|
Monday, November 25, 2024 | ||
order
Order to Show Cause Electronic Service upon the US Attorneys Office
Mon 11/25 4:25 PM
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Upon the complaint for writ of mandamus filed November 21, 2024, it is ORDERED that: The United States Attorney, as attorney for Defendants/Respondents, is directed to show cause on or before January 21, 2025 in writing, why a writ of mandamus should not issue, and shall serve a copy of the response on Plaintiff, with proof of service to the Clerk of Court; On or before April 21, 2025, Plaintiff shall file the reply, if any, with proof of service to the Clerk of Court. Service of a copy of this Order, together with a copy of the complaint, shall be made by the Clerk of Court via electronic case filing, to the United States Attorney and by mailing a copy of this Order to the plaintiff. Electronic Service upon the US Attorneys Office1 Complaint filed by Wengan Wu. Ordered by Judge Eric R. Komitee on 11/25/2024. (APJ) |
||
Thursday, November 21, 2024 | ||
3 | 3
![]() Summons Issued as to Michael Borgen, Joseph Cardinale, Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Connie Nolan, Christopher A. Wray, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (KD) |
|
2 | 2
![]() This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) |
|
1 | 1
![]() COMPLAINT against Michael Borgen, Joseph Cardinale, Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Connie Nolan, Christopher A. Wray filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-18519430 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Wengan WU. (Zhang, Henry) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Att: 2
![]() |
||
Att: 3
![]() |
||
utility
Case Assigned/Reassigned
Thu 11/21 4:58 PM
Case Assigned to Judge Eric R. Komitee. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our[LINK:website] . Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) |