Fall Line Patents, LLC v. DoorDash, Inc. et al PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER DOCKET IN THE LEAD CASE AS DIRECTED
Texas Eastern District Court | |
Judge: | Robert W Schroeder, III |
Case #: | 5:24-cv-00179 |
Nature of Suit | 830 Property Rights - Patent |
Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement |
Case Filed: | Nov 25, 2024 |
Last checked: Saturday May 24, 2025 4:15 AM CDT |
Defendant
DoorDash Essentials, LLC
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
DoorDash, Inc.
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Fall Line Patents, LLC
|
Represented By
|
Docket last updated: 05/23/2025 11:59 PM CDT |
Friday, March 21, 2025 | ||
36 | 36
![]() ORDER granting26 MOTION FOR LIMITED VENUE DISCOVERY; granting31 OPPOSED MOTION for Leave to File REPLY BRIEF SUPPORTING FALL LINE'S MOTION FOR LIMITED VENUE DISCOVERY. (Motion(s)26 ,31 terminated). Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 3/21/2025. (slo) |
|
Wednesday, March 19, 2025 | ||
35 | 35
![]() REPLY to Response re31 OPPOSED MOTION for Leave to File REPLY BRIEF SUPPORTING FALL LINE'S MOTION FOR LIMITED VENUE DISCOVERY (DKT. NO. 26) filed by Fall Line Patents, LLC .(Thompson, Larry) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Tuesday, March 18, 2025 | ||
34 | 34
![]() SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response re26 MOTION for Discovery MOTION FOR LIMITED VENUE DISCOVERY filed by DoorDash, Inc., DoorDash Essentials, LLC . (Rueckheim, Michael) |
|
33 | 33
![]() RESPONSE in Opposition re31 OPPOSED MOTION for Leave to File REPLY BRIEF SUPPORTING FALL LINE'S MOTION FOR LIMITED VENUE DISCOVERY (DKT. NO. 26) and in the Alternative Motion for Leave to File A Sur-Reply Brief filed by DoorDash, Inc., DoorDash Essentials, LLC .(Rueckheim, Michael) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Friday, March 14, 2025 | ||
32 | 32
![]() REPLY to Response re26 MOTION for Discovery MOTION FOR LIMITED VENUE DISCOVERY ,31 OPPOSED MOTION for Leave to File REPLY BRIEF SUPPORTING FALL LINE'S MOTION FOR LIMITED VENUE DISCOVERY (DKT. NO. 26) filed by Fall Line Patents, LLC . (Thompson, Larry) |
|
31 | 31
![]() OPPOSED MOTION for Leave to File REPLY BRIEF SUPPORTING FALL LINE'S MOTION FOR LIMITED VENUE DISCOVERY (DKT. NO. 26) by Fall Line Patents, LLC.(Thompson, Larry) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Wednesday, March 12, 2025 | ||
30 | 30
![]() ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff Fall Line Patents, LLC and Defendants Chili's, Inc. and Brinker International, Inc.'s (collectively "Chili's") Joint Motion to Dismiss the Chili's Defendants Only. Docket No. 56 . In the joint motion, Plaintiff and Chili's seek to dismiss with prejudice all claims against each other with each party bearing its own attorneys' fees and costs. Id. After review, the joint motion (Docket No. 56 ) is GRANTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that all claims made by Plaintiff and Chili's against each other in the above-captioned actions are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 3/12/2025. Associated Cases: 5:24-cv-00167-RWS, 5:24-cv-00089-RWS, 5:24-cv-00090-RWS, 5:24-cv-00091-RWS, 5:24-cv-00092-RWS, 5:24-cv-00094-RWS, 5:24-cv-00095-RWS, 5:24-cv-00096-RWS, 5:24-cv-00169-RWS, 5:24-cv-00170-RWS, 5:24-cv-00172-RWS, 5:24-cv-00173-RWS, 5:24-cv-00174-RWS, 5:24-cv-00175-RWS, 5:24-cv-00176-RWS, 5:24-cv-00177-RWS, 5:24-cv-00178-RWS, 5:24-cv-00179-RWS, 5:24-cv-00180-RWS, 5:24-cv-00181-RWS, 5:24-cv-00182-RWS(psm) |
|
Tuesday, March 11, 2025 | ||
29 | 29
![]() ORDER granting27 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Seal Defendant's Opposition to Motion for Venue Discovery. It is ORDERED that the Clerk of Court SEAL Defendants' response (Docket No. 28) to Plaintiff's motion for venue discovery. It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Local Rules, Defendants SHALL file within seven (7) days of this order a proposed public version that contains all necessary redactions. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 3/11/2025. (slo) |
|
Friday, March 07, 2025 | ||
28 | 28
![]() SEALED RESPONSE re26 MOTION for Discovery MOTION FOR LIMITED VENUE DISCOVERY filed by DoorDash, Inc., DoorDash Essentials, LLC.(Rueckheim, Michael) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
27 | 27
![]() UNOPPOSED MOTION to Seal Document Defendant's Opposition to Motion for Venue Discovery by DoorDash, Inc., DoorDash Essentials, LLC.(Rueckheim, Michael) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Wednesday, February 26, 2025 | ||
26 | 26
![]() MOTION for Discovery MOTION FOR LIMITED VENUE DISCOVERY by Fall Line Patents, LLC.(Harrington, Zachariah) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Att: 2
![]() |
||
Att: 3
![]() |
||
Att: 4
![]() |
||
Monday, February 24, 2025 | ||
25 | 25
![]() ORDER granting24 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to16 SEALED MOTION to Dismiss. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's deadline to respond to Defendants' motion to dismiss is two weeks after the Court issues an order on Plaintiff's forthcoming motion related to limited venue discovery. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 2/24/2025. (slo) |
|
Friday, February 21, 2025 | ||
24 | 24
![]() UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to16 SEALED MOTION to Dismiss by Fall Line Patents, LLC.(Harrington, Zachariah) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Tuesday, February 18, 2025 | ||
23 | 23
![]() ORDER granting22 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to16 SEALED MOTION to Dismiss . It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's deadline to respond to Defendants' motion to dismiss is March 7, 2025. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 2/18/2025. (slo) |
|
Friday, February 14, 2025 | ||
22 | 22
![]() UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to16 SEALED MOTION to Dismiss by Fall Line Patents, LLC.(Harrington, Zachariah) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Wednesday, February 12, 2025 | ||
21 | 21
![]() CONSOLIDATION ORDER. The Court ORDERS that the above-styled cases are consolidated for pretrial issues only, with the exception of venue. The earliest filed civil action (5:24-cv 00167) shall serve as the lead case for the consolidated issues. All future pretrial filings, other than venue motions,shall be filed in the lead case. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 2/12/2025. (slo) |
|
20 | 20
![]() ORDER granting15 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Seal Document Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. It is ORDERED that the Clerk of Court SEAL Defendants' motion to dismiss (Docket No. 16). It is further ORDERED that Docket No. 18 will remain unsealed and serve as the public version of the sealed motion. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 2/12/2025. (slo) |
|
Tuesday, February 11, 2025 | ||
19 | 19
![]() NOTICE of Readiness for Scheduling Conference by Fall Line Patents, LLC (Safiullah, Rehan) |
|
Monday, February 10, 2025 | ||
18 | 18
![]() REDACTION to16 SEALED MOTION to Dismiss by DoorDash, Inc., DoorDash Essentials, LLC.(Rueckheim, Michael) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Att: 2
![]() |
||
Att: 3
![]() |
||
Att: 4
![]() |
||
Att: 5
![]() |
||
Friday, February 07, 2025 | ||
17 | 17
![]() Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by DoorDash, Inc., DoorDash Essentials, LLC (Rueckheim, Michael) |
|
16 | 16
![]() SEALED MOTION to Dismiss by DoorDash, Inc., DoorDash Essentials, LLC.(Rueckheim, Michael) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Att: 2
![]() |
||
Att: 3
![]() |
||
Att: 4
![]() |
||
Att: 5
![]() |
||
15 | 15
![]() UNOPPOSED MOTION to Seal Document Defendant's Motion to Dismiss by DoorDash, Inc., DoorDash Essentials, LLC.(Rueckheim, Michael) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Friday, January 10, 2025 | ||
14 | 14
text
Clerk's Entry re Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint
Fri 01/10 8:17 AM
Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted. as to All Defendants. (psm) |
|
Wednesday, January 08, 2025 | ||
13 | 13
![]() Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint filed by DoorDash, Inc., DoorDash Essentials, LLC. Summons originally served on 12/3/2024. Agreed new answer date is 2/7/2025.(Rueckheim, Michael) |
|
Thursday, December 12, 2024 | ||
12 | 12
![]() SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fall Line Patents, LLC. DoorDash, Inc. served on 12/3/2024. (Antonelli, Matthew) |
|
11 | 11
![]() SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fall Line Patents, LLC. DoorDash Essentials, LLC served on 12/3/2024. (Antonelli, Matthew) |
|
10 | 10
text
Clerk's Entry re Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint
Thu 12/12 8:34 AM
Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted. DoorDash Essentials, LLC answer is now due 1/23/2025; DoorDash, Inc. answer is now due 1/23/2025. (slo) |
|
Wednesday, December 11, 2024 | ||
9 | 9
![]() Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint filed by DoorDash, Inc., DoorDash Essentials, LLC. Summons originally served on 12/3/2024. Agreed new answer date is 1/23/2025.(Rueckheim, Michael) |
|
Monday, December 02, 2024 | ||
8 | 8
![]() NOTICE of Related Cases by Fall Line Patents, LLC (Antonelli, Matthew) |
|
Wednesday, November 27, 2024 | ||
7 | 7
![]() Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Fall Line Patents, LLC (Antonelli, Matthew) |
|
6 | 6
![]() SUMMONS Issued as to DoorDash Essentials, LLC, DoorDash, Inc.(slo) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Tuesday, November 26, 2024 | ||
5 | 5
![]() NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Rehan Mohammed Safiullah on behalf of Fall Line Patents, LLC (Safiullah, Rehan) |
|
4 | 4
![]() NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Zachariah Harrington on behalf of Fall Line Patents, LLC (Harrington, Zachariah) |
|
3 | 3
![]() NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Larry Dean Thompson, Jr on behalf of Fall Line Patents, LLC (Thompson, Larry) |
|
Monday, November 25, 2024 | ||
2 | 2
![]() Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Antonelli, Matthew) |
|
1 | 1
![]() COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against DoorDash Essentials, LLC, DoorDash, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10517425.), filed by Fall Line Patents, LLC.(Antonelli, Matthew) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
utility
Case Assigned/Reassigned
Mon 11/25 4:57 PM
Case assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III. (slo) |
||
notice
Notice of Magistrate Judge Availability
Mon 11/25 4:57 PM
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form[LINK:Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge] is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge . (slo) |
||
misc
Jury Demand
Mon 11/25 4:58 PM
DEMAND for Trial by Jury. (slo) |