USA v. Weitershausen
Arizona District Court | |
Case #: | 2:25-cr-00374 |
Case Filed: | Mar 11, 2025 |
Last checked: Thursday Mar 13, 2025 12:17 AM MST |
Defendant
Maximilian Weitershausen (1)
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
USA
|
Represented By
|
Docket last updated: 03/13/2025 1:10 AM MST |
Friday, February 21, 2025 | ||
Arrest of Maximilian Weitershausen on 2/21/2025. (MRH) [2:25-mj-05111-DMF] | ||
Saturday, February 22, 2025 | ||
1 | 1
![]() |
|
Monday, February 24, 2025 | ||
2 | 2
![]() |
|
4 | 4 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle: Initial Appearance as to Maximilian Weitershausen held on 2/24/2025. DEFENDANT SWORN AS TO FINANCIAL STATUS. Appointing Kaitlin Sofia Verdura for Defendant. Government is seeking detention. For reasons stated on the record, the Defendant shall be placed at the end of the calendar to discuss the detention and preliminary hearings. Detention Hearing submitted. Defendant ordered released on own recognizance with conditions. Conditions of Release reviewed on the record with the Defendant. Preliminary Hearing waived. Finding: Defendant held to answer before District Court. As required by Rule 5(f), the United States is ordered to produce all information required by Brady v. Maryland and its progeny. Not doing so in a timely manner may result in sanctions including exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, and contempt proceedings. Appearances : AUSA Abbie Broughton and Megan Kelly for the Government, CJA Attorney Kaitlin Verdura for Defendant. Defendant is present and in custody. Hearing held 2:56 PM - 3:01 PM and 3:50 PM - 4:04 PM. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (AO) [2:25-mj-05111-DMF] | |
5 | 5 ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States is ordered to disclose in a timely manner all exculpatory evidence to the defendant(s), that is, all evidence that is favorable to the defendant(s) or tends to cast doubt on the United States' case, as required by Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny. Failure to comply with this order may result in consequences, including, but not limited to, the reversal of any conviction, the exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, disciplinary action, and/or sanctions by the Court. Ordered by Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle.(AO)(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) [2:25-mj-05111-DMF] | |
Tuesday, February 25, 2025 | ||
6 | 6
![]() |
|
Thursday, February 27, 2025 | ||
7 | 7
![]() |
|
8 | 8
![]() |
|
Tuesday, March 11, 2025 | ||
9 | 9
![]() |
|
10 | 10
![]() |
|
11 | 11
![]() |
|
12 | 12
![]() |
|
13 | 13
![]() |