USA v. Maqueda-Hernandez
| California Southern District Court | |
| Case #: | 3:25-mj-01222 |
| Case Filed: | Mar 17, 2025 |
| Last checked: Wednesday Mar 19, 2025 12:31 AM PDT |
|
Defendant
Jose Maqueda-Hernandez (1)
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
USA
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 03/19/2025 1:12 AM PDT |
| Saturday, March 15, 2025 | ||
| Arrest of Jose Maqueda-Hernandez (no document attached) (mxl) | ||
| Monday, March 17, 2025 | ||
| 1 | 1
COMPLAINT as to Jose Maqueda-Hernandez.(mxl)
|
|
|
Att: 1
Info Sheet
|
||
| 2 | 2 Set/Reset Duty Hearings as to Jose Maqueda-Hernandez: Initial Appearance set for 3/17/2025 before Magistrate Judge Valerie E. Torres. (no document attached) (fjp) | |
| 3 | 3
NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Dana Lauren Segal appearing for USA. (Segal, Dana)Attorney Dana Lauren Segal added to party USA(pty:pla) (jmo).
|
|
| 4 | 4 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Valerie E. Torres: Initial Appearance as to Jose Maqueda-Hernandez held on 3/17/2025. Appointed Attorney Robert H Rexrode, III (n/a) for Jose Maqueda-Hernandez. Government oral motion to detain(Flight). ( Detention Hearing - RF set for 3/20/2025 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Valerie E. Torres.) Rule 5 advisement provided. (Preliminary Hearing set for 3/27/25 at 1:30pm before Magistrate Judge Valerie E. Torres. Arraignment set for 4/10/25 at 1:30pm before Magistrate Judge Valerie E. Torres.) (Interpreter Matias Pizarro, Daniel Novoa). (CD# 3/17/2025 VET 25-1:3:26-3:50). (Plaintiff Attorney Adrian Henderson AUSA). (Defendant Attorney Julian Bugarin FD-S/A). (aje) | |
| 5 | 5 ***Spanish Interpreter needed as to Jose Maqueda-Hernandez (no document attached) (aje) | |
| 6 | 6 Oral MOTION to Detain (Flight)by USA as to Jose Maqueda-Hernandez. (no document attached) (aje) | |
| 7 | 7
ORDER as to Jose Maqueda-Hernandez: The Court orders the United States to comply with the continuing duty to disclose evidence which is favorable to the defendant as required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny. Upon finding that the government has failed to comply with this order, the Court may, as appropriate, order the production of such information, grant a continuance, impose evidentiary sanctions, or, in extreme cases, dismiss charges.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie E. Torres on 3/17/25. (aje)
|
|