USA v. Perez-Lopez
| Arizona District Court | |
| Case #: | 4:25-cr-01761 |
| Case Filed: | Apr 08, 2025 |
| Last checked: Thursday Apr 10, 2025 12:15 AM MST |
|
Defendant
Enrique Perez-Lopez (1)
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
USA
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 04/10/2025 1:23 AM MST |
| Wednesday, April 02, 2025 | ||
| Arrest of Enrique Perez-Lopez on 4/2/2025. (SGG) [4:25-mj-05882-N/A-EJM] | ||
| Thursday, April 03, 2025 | ||
| 1 | 1
COMPLAINT as to Enrique Perez-Lopez. (SGG) [4:25-mj-05882-N/A-EJM]
|
|
| Friday, April 04, 2025 | ||
| 3 | 3 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Lynnette C Kimmins: Initial Appearance as to Enrique Perez-Lopez held on 4/4/2025. Defendant(s) state true name to be the same. Government's motion for detention and request for continuance of the Detention Hearing is granted. Defendant(s) temporarily detained in the custody of the U.S. Marshal. Spanish Interpreter required. An attorney is appointed to represent the defendant. In the presence of government and defense counsel, the Court orally advises the government of their Brady obligation. Written order to follow. Appearances : AUSA Branden Kartchner (duty) for the Government, AFPD Ryan Moore specially appearing for defendant. Defendant is present and in custody. Spanish Interpreter Tania Sadler assists defendant. Detention Hearing set for 4/8/2025 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Eric J Markovich. Preliminary Hearing set for 4/8/2025 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Eric J Markovich. Hearing held 2:16 PM to 3:01 PM. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (JAM) [4:25-mj-05882-N/A-EJM] | |
| 4 | 4 ORDER: Under federal law, including Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and all applicable decisions from the Supreme Court and the Ninth Circuit interpreting Brady , the government has a continuing obligation to produce all information or evidence known to the government relating to guilt or punishment that might reasonably be considered favorable to the defendant's case, even if the evidence is not admissible so long as it is reasonably likely to lead to admissible evidence. See United States v. Price , 566 F.3d 900,913 n.14 (9th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, the court orders the government to produce to the defendant in a timely manner all such information or evidence. Information or evidence may be favorable to a defendant's case if it either may help bolster the defendant's case or impeach a prosecutor's witness or other government evidence. If doubt exists, it should be resolved in favor of the defendant with full disclosure being made. If the government believes that a required disclosure would compromise witness safety, victim rights, national security, a sensitive law-enforcement technique, or any other substantial government interest, the government may apply to the Court for a modification of the requirements of this Disclosure Order, which may include in camera review and/or withholding or subjecting to a protective order all or part of the information. This Disclosure Order is entered under Rule 5(f) and does not relieve any party in this matter of any other discovery obligation. The consequences for violating either this Disclosure Order or the government's obligations under Brady include, but are not limited to, the following: contempt, sanction, referral to a disciplinary authority, adverse jury instruction, exclusion of evidence, and dismissal of charges. Nothing in this Disclosure Order enlarges or diminishes the government's obligation to disclose information and evidence to a defendant under Brady , as interpreted and applied under Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit precedent. As the Supreme Court noted, "the government violates the Constitution's Due Process Clause 'if it withholds evidence that is favorable to the defense and material to the defendant's guilt or punishment." ' Turner v. United States , 137 S. Ct. 1885, 1888 (2017), quoting Smith v. Cain , 565 U.S. 73, 75 (2012). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lynnette C Kimmins.(JAM)(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) [4:25-mj-05882-N/A-EJM] | |
| 5 | 5 MINUTE ORDER: Added attorney Guenevere Dawn Nelson-Melby for Enrique Perez-Lopez. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (VSB) [4:25-mj-05882-N/A-EJM] | |
| Tuesday, April 08, 2025 | ||
| 6 | 6
INFORMATION - Felony as to Enrique Perez-Lopez (1) count(s) 1, 2. (BAC)
|
|
| 7 | 7
WAIVER OF INDICTMENT by Enrique Perez-Lopez. (BAC)
|
|
| 8 | 8
NOTICE OF CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING set for April 16, 2025 at 1:45 p.m. by Enrique Perez-Lopez. (Nelson-Melby, Guenevere)
|
|
| 9 | 9 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Eric J Markovich: Detention Hearing as to Enrique Perez-Lopez held on 4/8/2025. Defendant ordered detained pending trial. Preliminary Hearing as to defendant waived on 4/8/2025. Finding: Defendant held to answer before District Court. Appearances : AUSA David P Savel, attorney on duty for the Government, AFPD Guenevere Dawn Nelson-Melby for defendant. Defendant is present and in custody. Spanish Interpreter Lucinda Bush/Tania Sadler assists defendant. Hearing held 10:49 AM to 11:01 AM. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SCA) | |
| 10 | 10 Defense Counsel having contacted the court, IT IS ORDERED, as to Enrique Perez-Lopez, Change of Plea Hearing set for 4/16/2025 at 01:45 PM in Courtroom 5E, 405 West Congress Street, Tucson, AZ 85701 before Magistrate Judge Maria S Aguilera. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Maria S Aguilera.(LRG)(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) | |