Wintres v. Dudek
Delaware District Court | |
Judge: | Colm F Connolly |
Referred: | Eleanor G Tennyson |
Case #: | 1:25-cv-00585 |
Nature of Suit | 864 Social Security - SSID Title XVI |
Cause | 42:1383 Review of HHS Decision |
Case Filed: | May 12, 2025 |
Create an account to get the full party report for this case.
Docket last updated: 05/16/2025 11:59 PM EDT |
Friday, May 16, 2025 | ||
6 | 6
![]() ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Eleanor G. Tennyson to conduct all proceedings and hear and determine all motions. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 5/15/2025. ***Copy mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff*** (mws) |
|
Thursday, May 15, 2025 | ||
5 | 5
![]() ORDER granting1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 5/15/2025. ***Copy mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff*** (mws) |
|
Wednesday, May 14, 2025 | ||
utility
Case Assigned/Reassigned
Wed 05/14 10:26 AM
Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (nmf) |
||
Monday, May 12, 2025 | ||
4 | 4
![]() NOTICE of Appearance by Shawn Carver on behalf of Leland Dudek(Carver, Shawn) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
3 | 3
![]() Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (jfm) |
|
2 | 2
![]() COMPLAINT filed Pro Se against Leland Dudek - filed by Laqueisha Quanaisha A. Wintres.(jfm) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Att: 2
![]() |
||
1 | 1
![]() MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - filed by Laqueisha Quanaisha Ashley Wintres. (jfm) |
|
service
Notice of Transmittal - SSA Complaint
Mon 05/12 10:52 AM
Notice of filing (electronically and non-electronically) to Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel, United States Attorney for the District of Delaware, and Plaintiff. The Plaintiff need not serve a summons and complaint per Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 3 and 4. An answer or a motion under Civil Rule 12 must be made with 60 days after notice. Please use code Answer to Complaint - Social Security. ***Copy of NEF mailed to the Pro Se Plaintiff as notification that service was made electronically.*** (jfm) |