Manchanda v. Attorney Grievance Committee 1st Department et al
| New York Southern District Court | |
| Judge: | J Paul Oetken |
| Case #: | 1:25-cv-03935 |
| Nature of Suit | 440 Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights |
| Cause | 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Case Filed: | May 12, 2025 |
| Terminated: | May 16, 2025 |
| Case in other court: | New York Northern, 1:25-cv-00487 |
| Last checked: Saturday Nov 08, 2025 2:45 AM EST |
|
Defendant
Attorney Grievance Committee 1st Department
|
|
|
Defendant
NYS Supreme Court Appellate Division 1st Department
|
|
|
Plaintiff
Rahul Dev Manchanda
270 Victory Boulevard
New Rochelle, NY 10804 |
| Docket last updated: 03/02/2026 11:59 PM EST |
| Thursday, February 05, 2026 | ||
| 44 | 44
appeal
USCA Mandate
Thu 02/05 9:20 AM
MANDATE of USCA (Certified Copy) as to41 Notice of Appeal filed by Rahul Dev Manchanda. USCA Case Number 25-1870 Appellant, pro se, moves for a default judgment, expedited consideration, reinstatement of his law license, and for this Court to take judicial notice of "systematic retaliation and institutional clustering," and "a pattern of procedural delay, docket manipulation, and administrative interference." Upon due consideration, it is hereby ORDERED that the motions for a default judgment and judicial notice are DENIED. See Int'l Star Class Yacht Racing Ass'n v. Tommy Hilfiger U.S.A., Inc., 146 F.3d 66, 70 (2d Cir. 1998). It is further ORDERED that the appeal is DISMISSED because it "lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact." Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989); Pillay v. INS, 45 F.3d 14, 17 (2d Cir. 1995) (per curiam). The remaining motions are DENIED as moot. We note that in August 2025, this Court imposed a leave-to-file sanction on Appellant, but he filed this appeal before that sanction was imposed.. Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk USCA for the Second Circuit. Issued As Mandate: 2/4/2026..(nd) |
|
| Wednesday, November 05, 2025 | ||
|
appeal
Appeal Record Sent to USCA - Electronic File
Wed 11/05 4:30 PM
Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). USCA Case Number 25-1870 Certified Indexed record on Appeal Electronic Files for41 Notice of Appeal filed by Rahul Dev Manchandawere transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals..(nd) |
||
| Friday, October 17, 2025 | ||
|
appeal
USCA Appeal Fees
Fri 10/17 12:05 PM
USCA Appeal Fees received $ 605.00 receipt number 43958 on 10/17/2025 re:41 Notice of Appeal filed by Rahul Dev Manchanda..(nd) |
||
| Monday, October 06, 2025 | ||
|
misc
Pro Se Payment of Fee - Deficient
Mon 10/06 3:58 PM
Deficient Pro Se Payment of Fee Received: Incorrect Payment Type received by the Finance Department on 10/6/2025, in the amount of $605.00. Payment will be returned pursuant to Standing Order M10-468. (je) |
||
| Friday, August 01, 2025 | ||
|
misc
Mailing Receipt
Fri 08/01 9:52 AM
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 43. Mailed to: Rahul Dev Manchanda 270 Victory Boulevard New Rochelle, NY 10804. (kma) |
||
| Wednesday, July 30, 2025 | ||
| 43 | 43
2
pgs
order
Order
Thu 07/31 10:24 AM
ORDER : Plaintiff's motion to reconsider is therefore DENIED. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 7/30/25) (yv) |
|
| Friday, July 25, 2025 | ||
| 42 | 42
misc
Letter
Tue 07/29 11:22 AM
LETTER addressed to Judge J. Paul Oetken from Rahul Manchanda dated 7/25/2025 re: Plaintiff Letter Request for Reconsideration of Dismissal Order. Document filed by Rahul Dev Manchanda.(vn) |
|
| 41 | 41
appeal
Notice of Appeal
Fri 07/25 2:16 PM
NOTICE OF APPEAL from40 Order of Dismissal,,. Document filed by Rahul Dev Manchanda..(nd) |
|
|
misc
Mailing Receipt
Fri 07/25 9:12 AM
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 40. Mailed to: Rahul Dev Manchanda 270 Victory Boulevard New Rochelle, NY 10804. (mjy) |
||
|
appeal
Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to USCA
Fri 07/25 2:16 PM
Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re:41 Notice of Appeal..(nd) |
||
| Thursday, July 24, 2025 | ||
| 40 | 40
4
pgs
order
Order of Dismissal
Thu 07/24 11:00 AM
ORDER: For all of these reasons, this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. This case is already closed, and it will remain closed. This is the final order in this case. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 7/24/2025) (vfr) |
|
| Thursday, July 10, 2025 | ||
| 39 | 39
respoth
Response (non-motion)
Fri 07/11 6:08 PM
RESPONSE LETTER TO OPPOSING COUNSEL AAG. Document filed by Rahul Dev Manchanda..(ks) |
|
| Wednesday, July 09, 2025 | ||
| 38 | 38
service
Certificate of Service Other
Wed 07/09 5:20 PM
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of letter served on Rahul Manchanda on 7/9/25. Service was made by Mail and Email. Document filed by Attorney Grievance Committee 1st Department, NYS Supreme Court Appellate Division 1st Department..(Bhat, Anjali) |
|
| 37 | 37
misc
Letter
Wed 07/09 2:10 PM
LETTER addressed to Judge J. Paul Oetken from Anjali Bhat dated July 9, 2025 re: Order at ECF No. 36 and State Defendants' position regarding leave to file. Document filed by Attorney Grievance Committee 1st Department, NYS Supreme Court Appellate Division 1st Department..(Bhat, Anjali) |
|
|
Att: 1
Exhibit Disbarment Order
|
||
| Thursday, June 26, 2025 | ||
|
misc
Mailing Receipt
Thu 06/26 11:40 AM
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 36. Mailed to: Rahul Dev Manchanda 270 Victory Boulevard New Rochelle, NY 10804. (kma) |
||
| Wednesday, June 25, 2025 | ||
| 36 | 36
1
pgs
order
Order
Wed 06/25 1:39 PM
ORDER: Plaintiff Manchanda, a lawyer proceeding pro se, has since filed additional letters purporting to comply with the injunction. (See ECF Nos. 29, 30, 35.) The Court invites Defendants to file a letter by July 9, 2025 stating their position on whether Manchanda has now complied with the filing injunction, including whether the claims asserted in this case are different than those asserted in his prior cases. Defendants also may file an appearance through counsel on ECF for the limited purpose of receiving notice of filings in this case and without prejudice to the assertion of any substantive or procedural defenses. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 6/25/2025) (vfr) |
|
| Thursday, June 12, 2025 | ||
| 35 | 35
misc
Letter
Thu 06/12 6:51 PM
LETTER addressed to Judge Laura Taylor Swain from Rahul Manchanda dated 6/3/2025 re: Final Curing of Chief Judge Laura Swain's Repeated Denial of Case Continuation 25cv3935 Document filed by Rahul Dev Manchanda. (jca) |
|
| Tuesday, June 10, 2025 | ||
| 34 | 34
misc
Letter
Tue 06/10 6:27 PM
LETTER addressed to Judge Laura Taylor Swain from Rahul Manchanda (Pro Se) dated 6/10/2025 re: Plaintiff Response Letter to Opposing Counsel AAG Anjali Bhats Continued Opposition To Case Continuation 25-CV-3935, Even After Final Curing of Chief Judge Laura Swains Requests. Document filed by Rahul Dev Manchanda.(tg) |
|
| 33 | 33
misc
Letter
Tue 06/10 1:56 PM
LETTER addressed to Judge Laura Taylor Swain from Rahul Manchanda (Pro Se) dated 6/3/2025 re: Plaintiff Response Letter to Opposing Counsel AAG Anjali Bhats Continued Opposition To Case Continuation 25-CV-3935, Even After Final Curing of Chief Judge Laura Swains Requests. Document filed by Rahul Dev Manchanda.(tg) |
|
| Monday, June 09, 2025 | ||
| 32 | 32
service
Certificate of Service Other
Mon 06/09 5:24 PM
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Letter served on Rahul Manchanda on June 9, 2025. Service was made by Mail and Email. Document filed by Attorney Grievance Committee 1st Department, NYS Supreme Court Appellate Division 1st Department..(Bhat, Anjali) |
|
| 31 | 31
misc
Letter
Mon 06/09 3:32 PM
LETTER addressed to Judge Laura Taylor Swain from Anjali Bhat dated 6/9/25 re: opposition to apparent renewed motion for leave to file. Document filed by Attorney Grievance Committee 1st Department, NYS Supreme Court Appellate Division 1st Department..(Bhat, Anjali) |
|
|
notice
Notice of Case Assignment/Reassignment
Mon 06/09 4:19 PM
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge J. Paul Oetken. Judge Laura Taylor Swain is no longer assigned to the case. (vba) |
||
|
utility
Case Designation
Mon 06/09 4:19 PM
Magistrate Judge Jennifer Willis is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link:[LINK:https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf] . (vba) |
||
| Wednesday, June 04, 2025 | ||
| 30 | 30
misc
Letter
Wed 06/04 6:11 PM
LETTER addressed to Judge Laura Taylor Swain from Rahul Manchanda dated June 3, 2025 re: Final Curing of Chief Judge Laura Swains Repeated Denial of Case Continuation 25-CV-3935. Document filed by Rahul Dev Manchanda.(jca) |
|
| Tuesday, June 03, 2025 | ||
| 29 | 29
misc
Letter
Wed 06/04 12:55 PM
LETTER addressed to Judge Laura Taylor Swain from Rahul Manchanda dated 6/3/2025 re: Final Curing of Chief Judge Laura Swains Repeated Denial of Case Continuation. Document filed by Rahul Dev Manchanda.(rro) |
|
| 28 | 28
service
Certificate of Service Complaints
Wed 06/04 12:21 PM
PROOF OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Attorney Grievance Committee 1st Department served on 4/30/2025, answer due 5/21/2025. Service was accepted by Anthony Rodriquez. Document filed by Rahul Dev Manchanda. (tg) |
|
| Saturday, May 31, 2025 | ||
| 27 | 27
misc
Letter
Mon 06/02 3:39 PM
LETTER addressed to Judge Laura Taylor Swain from Rahul Manchanda dated 5/22/25 re: Response to Chief Judge Laura Swain's Repeated Denial of Case Continuation. Document filed by Rahul Dev Manchanda.(yv) |
|
| Thursday, May 29, 2025 | ||
|
misc
Mailing Receipt
Thu 05/29 9:08 PM
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 24. Mailed to: Rahul Dev Manchanda 270 Victory Boulevard New Rochelle, NY 10804. (tro) |
||
| Wednesday, May 28, 2025 | ||
| 26 | 26
notice
Notice (Other)
Sat 05/31 10:47 AM
NOTICE of Motion for Contempt of Court Against Judge Laura T. Swain and Assistant Attorney General Anjali Bhat. Document filed by Rahul Dev Manchanda. (tro) |
|
| 25 | 25
misc
Letter
Sat 05/31 10:44 AM
LETTER addressed to Judge Laura Taylor Swain from Rahul Manchanda dated 5/22/2025 re: In further Response to Assistant Attorney General (AAG) Anjali Bhats May 22, 2025 Letter in Opposition to Plaintiffs Leave to Appeal. Document filed by Rahul Dev Manchanda.(tro) |
|
| 24 | 24
2
pgs
order
Order
Wed 05/28 6:07 PM
ORDER: Plaintiff filed this action pro se. On May 16, 2025, the Court dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1651, without prejudice, for failure to comply with the injunction issued in Manchanda v. Walsh, ECF 1:23-CV-7637, 56 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 5, 2024). On May 19, 2025, Plaintiff filed a document titled, "Response to Order of Dismissal without Prejudice with Motion Pursuant to Court Order Seeking Leave to file." (ECF 17.) The Court denies Plaintiff's leave to file application because he does not comply with the injunction set forth in Manchanda, No. 23-CV-7637. Specifically, Plaintiff's leave application does not identify by listing the full caption of every suit he has previously brought in any New York state or federal court against any defendant to the suit he wishes to file or remove and he does not "provide a copy of each such complaint and a certified record of its disposition." Id. at 2. Because Plaintiff does not comply with these two requirements, the Court denies the leave application. This case remains closed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 5/23/2025) (jca) Modified on 5/28/2025 (jca) |
|
| Thursday, May 22, 2025 | ||
| 23 | 23
respoth
Response (non-motion)
Tue 05/27 6:48 PM
RESPONSE TO ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITH MOTION PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER SEEKING LEAVE TO FILE re:13 Order of Dismissal. Document filed by Rahul Dev Manchanda. (ar) |
|
| 22 | 22
misc
Letter
Tue 05/27 2:55 PM
LETTER addressed to Judge Laura Taylor Swain from Rahul Dev Manchanda dated 5/22/2025 re: In Response to Assistant Attorney General (AAG) Anjali Bhats May 22, 2025 Letter in Opposition to Plaintiffs Leave to Appeal, we respond as follows herein. Document filed by Rahul Dev Manchanda.(tp) |
|
| 21 | 21
misc
Letter
Fri 05/23 3:27 PM
LETTER addressed to Judge Laura Taylor Swain from Rahul Manchanda dated 5/22/2025 re: You dismissed this case without prejudice, even though it was transferred to your court without my consent, opinion, or request, from where it was originally filed in the Northern District of New York.. Document filed by Rahul Dev Manchanda..(nd) |
|
| 19 | 19
service
Certificate of Service Other
Thu 05/22 4:59 PM
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Letter served on Rahul Manchanda on 5/22/25. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Attorney Grievance Committee 1st Department, NYS Supreme Court Appellate Division 1st Department..(Bhat, Anjali) |
|
| 18 | 18
misc
Letter
Thu 05/22 2:27 PM
LETTER addressed to Judge Laura Taylor Swain from Anjali Bhat dated 5/22/25 re: in opposition to motion for leave to file the instant action (ECF No. 17). Document filed by Attorney Grievance Committee 1st Department, NYS Supreme Court Appellate Division 1st Department..(Bhat, Anjali) |
|
|
misc
Mailing Receipt
Thu 05/22 9:07 AM
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 16. Mailed to: Rahul Dev Manchanda 270 Victory Boulevard New Rochelle, NY 10804. (kma) |
||
| Wednesday, May 21, 2025 | ||
| 16 | 16
6
pgs
order
Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
Wed 05/21 10:10 AM
ORDER denying15 Motion. Plaintiff's motion (ECF 15), construed as a motion for reconsideration, is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all motions in this action. This case remains closed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 5/21/2025) (mml) |
|
| Tuesday, May 20, 2025 | ||
| 20 | 20
misc
Letter
Fri 05/23 10:55 AM
LETTER addressed to Judge Laura Taylor Swain from Rahul Manchanda dated 5/14/2025 re: Original filing. Document filed by Rahul Dev Manchanda.(ar) |
|
| Monday, May 19, 2025 | ||
| 17 | 17
respoth
Response (non-motion)
Wed 05/21 12:38 PM
RESPONSE TO ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITH MOTION PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER SEEKING LEAVE TO FILE re:13 Order of Dismissal. Document filed by Rahul Dev Manchanda. (jjc) |
|
|
misc
Mailing Receipt
Mon 05/19 4:18 PM
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 143. Mailed to: Rahul Dev Manchanda 270 Victory Boulevard New Rochelle, NY 10804. (kma) |
||
|
misc
Mailing Receipt
Mon 05/19 4:19 PM
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 14. Mailed to: Rahul Dev Manchanda 270 Victory Boulevard New Rochelle, NY 10804. (kma) |
||
|
misc
Mailing Receipt
Mon 05/19 4:41 PM
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 13. Mailed to: Rahul Dev Manchanda 270 Victory Boulevard New Rochelle, NY 10804. (kma) |
||
| Friday, May 16, 2025 | ||
| 15 | 15
motion
Miscellaneous Relief
Mon 05/19 3:51 PM
NOTICE OF MOTION CONTEMPT OF COURT AGAINST JUDGE LAURA T SWAIN AND ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL ANJALI BHAT. Document filed by Rahul Dev Manchanda. (ar) |
|
| 14 | 14
order
Judgment
Fri 05/16 12:16 PM
CIVIL JUDGMENT. For the reasons stated in the May 16, 2025, order, this action is dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the February 5, 2024 order.The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith.SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 5/16/2025) (nd) |
|
|
Att: 1
Notice of Right to Appeal
|
||
| 13 | 13
2
pgs
order
Order of Dismissal
Fri 05/16 8:42 AM
ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1651: The Court therefore dismisses the action without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the February 5, 2024 order. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment in this action. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 5/16/2025) (nb) |
|
| Thursday, May 15, 2025 | ||
| 12 | 12
service
Certificate of Service Other
Thu 05/15 6:02 PM
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Response served on ANJALI BHAT on 5/15/2025. Service was made by Mail, Electronic Mail, ECF. Document filed by Rahul Dev Manchanda. (jjc) |
|
|
Att: 1
Exhibit exhibit to cos
|
||
| Wednesday, May 14, 2025 | ||
| 11 | 11
misc
Letter
Wed 05/14 6:40 PM
LETTER addressed to Judge Laura Taylor Swain from Rahul Manchanda Pro Se dated 5/14/2025 re: True to the cowardly and evasive nature of the New York State Attorney General's Office and its current clients, Plaintiff Rahul Manchanda does not need to remind this court that he did not file here in the Southern District of New York, but rather in the Northern District of New York in Albany New York because the last decision that he was appealing/removing from, originated in the New York Court of Appeals located at 20 Eagle Street, Albany New York, where his Motion to Reconsider is still pending. Document filed by Rahul Dev Manchanda. (tg) |
|
| 10 | 10
service
Certificate of Service Other
Wed 05/14 12:02 PM
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Letter served on Rahul Manchanda on 5/14/25. Service was made by Mail and Email. Document filed by Attorney Grievance Committee 1st Department, NYS Supreme Court Appellate Division 1st Department..(Bhat, Anjali) |
|
| Tuesday, May 13, 2025 | ||
| 9 | 9
misc
Letter
Tue 05/13 5:26 PM
LETTER addressed to Judge Laura Taylor Swain from Anjali Bhat dated 5/13/25 re: filing injunction against pro se plaintiff. Document filed by Attorney Grievance Committee 1st Department, NYS Supreme Court Appellate Division 1st Department..(Bhat, Anjali) |
|
|
Att: 1
Exhibit Filing Injunction,
|
||
|
Att: 2
Exhibit Appeal Dismissal
|
||
|
misc
Mailing Receipt
Tue 05/13 10:59 AM
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 8. Mailed to: Rahul Dev Manchanda 270 Victory Boulevard New Rochelle, NY 10804. (mjy) |
||
|
notice
Notice of Case Assignment/Reassignment - Sua Sponte
Tue 05/13 1:16 PM
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (vba) |
||
| Monday, May 12, 2025 | ||
| 8 | 8
order
Standing Order re Cases Filed By Pro Se Plaintiffs
Mon 05/12 1:07 PM
STANDING ORDER IN RE CASES FILED BY PRO SE PLAINTIFFS (See 24-MISC-127 Standing Order filed March 18, 2024). To ensure that all cases heard in the Southern District of New York are handled promptly and efficiently, all parties must keep the court apprised of any new contact information. It is a party's obligation to provide an address for service; service of court orders cannot be accomplished if a party does not update the court when a change of address occurs. Accordingly, all self-represented litigants are hereby ORDERED to inform the court of each change in their address or electronic contact information. Parties may[LINK:consent to electronic service] to receive notifications of court filings by email, rather than relying on regular mail delivery. Parties may also ask the court for[LINK:permission to file documents electronically] . Forms, including instructions for consenting to electronic service and requesting permission to file documents electronically, may be found by clicking on the hyperlinks in this order, or by accessing the forms on the courts website, nysd.uscourts.gov/forms. The procedures that follow apply only to cases filed by pro se plaintiffs. If the court receives notice from the United States Postal Service that an order has been returned to the court, or otherwise receives information that the address of record for a self-represented plaintiff is no longer valid, the court may issue an Order to Show Cause why the case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with this order. Such order will be sent to the plaintiffs last known address and will also be viewable on the court's electronic docket. A notice directing the parties' attention to this order shall be docketed (and mailed to any self-represented party that has appeared and has not consented to electronic service) upon the opening of each case or miscellaneous matter that is classified as pro se in the court's records. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/18/2024) (vba) |
|
| 7 | 7
transfer
Case Transferred In - District Transfer
Mon 05/12 1:02 PM
CASE TRANSFERRED IN from the United States District Court - District of New York Northern; Case Number: 1:25-cv-00487. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket entries received. |
|
|
utility
Case Designated ECF
Mon 05/12 1:03 PM
Case Designated ECF. (vba) |
||
|
notice
Case Opening Initial Assignment Notice - Transfer Case
Mon 05/12 1:04 PM
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE - TRANSFER CASE: This case is assigned to: Unassigned Judge. (vba) |
||
|
service
Note Regarding Service on Self-Represented Party
Mon 05/12 1:06 PM
CASE MANAGEMENT NOTE: For each electronic filing made in a case involving a self-represented party who has not consented to electronic service, the filing party must serve the document on such self-represented party in a manner permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2) (other than through the ECF system) and file proof of service for each document so served. Please see[LINK:Rule 9.2] of the courts ECF Rules & Instructions for further information..(vba) |
||
| Friday, May 02, 2025 | ||
| 6 | 6
PRO SE NOTICE received signed in the mail. (tll) [Transferred from New York Northern on 5/12/2025.]
|
|
| Wednesday, April 23, 2025 | ||
| 5 | 5 TEXT ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Southern District of New York: As the Court has determined that this matter was filed in the incorrect district, it is ordered that this action is hereby transferred to the Southern District of New York. SO ORDERED by U.S. Magistrate Judge Mitchell J. Katz on 4/23/2025. (Copy served upon Pro Se Plaintiff via regular mail) (kck) [Transferred from New York Northern on 5/12/2025.] | |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Pursuant to NYND Local Rule 3.7, this case will be electronically transferred to the Southern District of New York 14 days after the date of the Transfer Order, unless the parties file a joint letter request to transfer the case sooner. (Copy served upon Pro Se Plaintiff via Regular Mail) (kck) [Transferred from New York Northern on 5/12/2025.] | ||
| Friday, April 18, 2025 | ||
| 4 | 4
PRO SE HANDBOOK, NOTICE and copy of Local Rules mailed to Plaintiff via regular mail. (tll) [Transferred from New York Northern on 5/12/2025.]
|
|
| 3 | 3
G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Telephone Conference set for 7/21/2025 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Mitchell J. Katz. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 7/14/2025. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) Copy mailed to Plaintiff via regular mail.(tll) [Transferred from New York Northern on 5/12/2025.]
|
|
| 2 | 2
Summons Issued as to Attorney Grievance Committee 1st Department, NYS Supreme Court Appellate Division 1st Department. Copies mailed to Plaintiff for service via regular mail. (tll) [Transferred from New York Northern on 5/12/2025.]
|
|
| 1 | 1
29
pgs
COMPLAINT against Attorney Grievance Committee 1st Department, NYS Supreme Court Appellate Division 1st Department (Filing fee $405 receipt number 100000756) filed by Rahul Dev Manchanda.(tll) [Transferred from New York Northern on 5/12/2025.]
|
|
|
Att: 1
Envelope,
|
||
|
Att: 2
Civil Cover Sheet
|
||