Davis v. Walsh Kokosing Joint Venture et al
| Ohio Southern District Court | |
| Judge: | Douglas R Cole |
| Referred: | Karen L Litkovitz |
| Case #: | 1:25-cv-00393 |
| Nature of Suit | 440 Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights |
| Cause | 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Case Filed: | Jun 12, 2025 |
| Last checked: Tuesday Dec 09, 2025 3:18 AM EST |
|
Defendant
Does 1-20
|
|
|
Defendant
Debora Green
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Icy Williams of Web Ventures, LLC
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Jack Marchbanks
|
|
|
Defendant
Lauren Purdy
|
|
|
Defendant
Arik Quam
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Ohio Department of Transportation
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Walsh Kokosing Joint Venture
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Walsh Kokosing Joint Venture II
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
Jamir Davis
in his individual capacity 328 Scott Street
Covington, KY 41011 |
|
|
Plaintiff
J. Davis Law Firm, PLLC
|
GPO
Mar 30 2026
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS the Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 20, 21, 23). Thus, the Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Counts 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, and 12. Because Davis potentially could cure those deficiencies, though, the Court GRANTS Davis 30 days to file a motion for leave to amend, attaching a proposed amended complaint that addresses the identified deficiencies. The Court, however, DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Counts 1 through 5 against Williams, Counts 5 and 12 against Green in her official capacity, Counts 9 and 12 against ODOT, and Walsh Kokosing Joint Venture [I] as a Defendant. For now, the Court holds the state claims (Counts 1-5 and 11) against Walsh Kokosing in abeyance. Additionally, the Court ORDERS Plaintiffs to show cause in writing within 30 days (1) why JDLF should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute due to the failure to secure counsel, and (2) why Defendants Marchbanks and Purdy should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute following the failure to timely serve them. Signed by Judge Douglas R. Cole on 3/30/26. (mas)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
|
|
GPO
Jul 06 2026
OPINION AND ORDER denying 39 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Douglas R. Cole on 7/6/26. (ds)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
| Docket last updated: 09/30/2026 11:59 PM EDT |
| Tuesday, July 21, 2026 | ||
| 58 | 58
respm
Reply to Response to Motion
Tue 07/21 2:30 PM
REPLY to Response to Motion re53 Second MOTION to Amend/Correct Order on Motion to Amend/Correct,,,,,,,, Order on Motion to Strike,,,, Order on Motion for Hearing,,,, Telephone Conference,,, filed by Plaintiffs Jamir Anree Davis, I, J. Davis Law Firm, PLLC. (Davis, Jamir) |
|
|
Att: 1
Exhibit ODOT Findings
|
||
| 57 | 57
respm
Reply to Response to Motion
Tue 07/21 2:27 PM
REPLY to Response to Motion re53 Second MOTION to Amend/Correct Order on Motion to Amend/Correct,,,,,,,, Order on Motion to Strike,,,, Order on Motion for Hearing,,,, Telephone Conference,,, filed by Plaintiffs Jamir Anree Davis, I, J. Davis Law Firm, PLLC. (Davis, Jamir) |
|
|
Att: 1
Exhibit ODOT Findings
|
||
| Thursday, July 16, 2026 | ||
| 56 | 56
respm
Response in Opposition to Motion
Thu 07/16 1:28 PM
RESPONSE in Opposition re53 Second MOTION to Amend/Correct Order on Motion to Amend/Correct,,,,,,,, Order on Motion to Strike,,,, Order on Motion for Hearing,,,, Telephone Conference,,, filed by Defendants Debora Green, Ohio Department of Transportation. (Kazar, Michelle) |
|
| Tuesday, July 14, 2026 | ||
| 55 | 55
respm
Response to Motion
Tue 07/14 12:13 PM
RESPONSE to Motion re53 Second MOTION to Amend/Correct Order on Motion to Amend/Correct,,,,,,,, Order on Motion to Strike,,,, Order on Motion for Hearing,,,, Telephone Conference,,, filed by Defendants Arik Quam, Walsh Kokosing Joint Venture, Walsh Kokosing Joint Venture II. (Geisen, William) |
|
|
Att: 1
Exhibit Exhibit 1 Declaration of Lauren Pittman
|
||