Philliben et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

California Northern District Court
Judge:	Jon S Tigar
Case #:	4:14-cv-05615
Nature of Suit	370 Torts - Personal Property - Other Fraud
Cause	28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

Case Filed:	Dec 23, 2014
Terminated:	Mar 10, 2020

Last checked: Sunday Jun 21, 2015 5:23 AM PDT

Defendant Rasier, LLC	Represented By Nathaniel H. Lipanovich Irell & Manella LLP contact info Michael David Harbour Irell & Manella LLP contact info Andra Barmash Greene Irell & Manella LLP contact info Justin Nathanael Owens Irell & Manella LLP contact info Alvin Matthew Ashley Irell & Manella LLP contact info
Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.	Represented By Nathaniel H. Lipanovich Irell & Manella LLP contact info Michael David Harbour Irell & Manella LLP contact info Andra Barmash Greene Irell & Manella LLP contact info Justin Nathanael Owens Irell & Manella LLP contact info Alvin Matthew Ashley Irell & Manella LLP contact info
Miscellaneous The People of the State of California	Represented By Ernst Andrew Halperin Office Of The San Francisco District Attorney contact info
Plaintiff Byron McKnight	Represented By Nicholas A. Coulson Liddle & Dubin, P.C. contact info Alfredo Torrijos Arias Ozzello & Gignac LLP contact info Steven D. Liddle Liddle & Dubin, P.C. contact info Mickel Montalban Arias Arias Sanguinetti Stahle & Torrijos, LLP contact info Steven Liddle Liddle & Dubin, P.C. contact info
Plaintiff Matthew Philliben	Represented By Nicholas A. Coulson Liddle & Dubin, P.C. contact info Alfredo Torrijos Arias Ozzello & Gignac LLP contact info Steven D. Liddle Liddle & Dubin, P.C. contact info Mickel Montalban Arias Arias Sanguinetti Stahle & Torrijos, LLP contact info Steven Liddle Liddle & Dubin, P.C. contact info

1.	Uber Riders File Class Action Lawsuit Over 'Safe Rides Fee' (gizmodo.com)
	Submitted Mon 12/29/2014

Docket last updated: 05/08/2025 11:59 PM PDT

Thursday, December 22, 2022
276		276 appeal USCA Mandate Thu 12/22 11:16 AM MANDATE of USCA case number 21-16626 as to241 Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit, filed by Robert Hudson. The judgment of this Court, entered November 30, 2022, takes effect this date. This constitutes the formal mandate of this Court issued pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Costs are taxed against the appellant in the amount of $191.40. (jlg, COURT STAFF) Related: [-]
275		275 appeal USCA Mandate Thu 12/22 11:06 AM MANDATE of USCA case number 21-16625 as to240 Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit filed by Morgan Gordon,251 Amended Notice of Appeal filed by Morgan Gordon. The judgment of this Court, entered November 30, 2022, takes effect this date. This constitutes the formal mandate of this Court issued pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Costs are taxed against the appellant in the amount of $24.60. (jlg, COURT STAFF) Related: [-]
274		274 appeal USCA Mandate Thu 12/22 10:03 AM MANDATE of USCA case number 21-16623 as to239 Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit, filed by Jennifer Hinojosa. The judgment of this Court, entered November 30, 2022, takes effect this date. This constitutes the formal mandate of this Court issued pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Costs are taxed against the appellant in the amount of $164.40 (jlg, COURT STAFF) Related: [-]

Continue to Create Account