Grant et al v. Hilton et al
| Missouri Eastern District Court | |
| Judge: | Joshua M Divine |
| Case #: | 4:25-cv-01203 |
| Nature of Suit | 470 Other Statutes - Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| Cause | 18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Case Filed: | Aug 11, 2025 |
| Terminated: | Apr 23, 2026 |
| Last checked: Saturday Feb 07, 2026 1:54 AM CST |
|
Defendant
Con Curran Coulter
14171 Parliament Dr.
Chesterfield, MO 63017 |
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
The Coulter Law Group, LLC
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Rienker, Hamilton, Fenley, LLC
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Gillespie Hetlage & Coughlin LLC
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
John Fenley
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Mathew G. Eilerts
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Rebecca A. Copeland
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Staci Thomas
1730 Mason Knoll Rd
St. Louis, MO 63131 |
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Bruce F. Hilton
105 South Central
St. Louis, MO 63105 |
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Growe Eisen Karlen Eilerts, LLC
120 South Central Suite 150
St. Louis, MO 63105 |
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Mary W. Greaves
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Sarah M. Grant
17051 Cambury Lane
Grover, MO 63040 |
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Lawrence Gillespie
120 South Central Suite 650
St. Louis, MO 63105 |
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Maia Brodie
individually and 9 Manderleigh Estate
St. Louis, MO 63131 |
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
Matthew R. Grant
St. Louis, MO 63101
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
Stop Missouri Corruption, LLC
|
Represented By
|
| TERMINATED PARTIES | |
|
Defendant
Co-Conspirators 1-100
Terminated: 09/15/2025
|
|
|
Defendant
State of Missouri
Terminated: 09/15/2025
Jefferson City, MO 65102
|
|
|
Intervenor
Angela M Freiner
Terminated: 09/17/2025
8547 Pilot Ave
St. Louis, MO 63123 |
|
GPO
Sep 03 2025
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND SHOW-CAUSE ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than Monday, September 15, 2025, Grant must show cause, in 10 pages or less, as to why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and why he should not be sanctioned under Rule 11. In the alternative, he may, as a matter of right under Rule 15(a) (1)(A), file an amended complaint that rectifies all these issues and any other apparent issues. Finally, he may voluntarily dismiss the case. Any filing must strictly conform not only to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and to the local rules of the Eastern District of Missouri, but also to the judge's local rules, as explained in Docket Entry 9 (August 21, 2025). Failure to do so may lead to sanctions or dismissal. E.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 83(a)-(b). (Show Cause Response due by 9/15/2025.). Signed by District Judge Joshua M. Divine on 9/3/2025. (LNJ) |
|
|
GPO
Apr 23 2026
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' motions to dismiss, ECF 50, 52, 54, 70, 84, 86, 101, are GRANTED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Grant's motion for leave to file second amended complaint, ECF 114, is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Maia Brodie's motion to seal or redact pleadings filed by plaintiff, ECF 118, is DENIED because the information requested to be sealed does not meet the standards of Local Rule 13.05. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to intervene, ECF 128, is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Joshua M. Divine on 4/23/26. (JAB) |
| Docket last updated: 10/02/2026 11:59 PM CDT |
| Friday, October 02, 2026 | ||
| 142 | 142
appeal
USCA Mandate
Fri 10/02 11:06 AM
MANDATE of USCA as to134 Notice of Appeal filed by Stop Missouri Corruption, LLC, Matthew R. Grant USCA # 26-2050 In accordance with the judgment and pursuant to the provisions of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 41(a), the formal mandate is hereby issued in the above-styled matter. Appeal is AFFIRMED. (TMT) |
|