Coddington v. Asante
| Oregon District Court | |
| Judge: | Mark D Clarke |
| Case #: | 1:25-cv-02363 |
| Nature of Suit | 445 Civil Rights - Amer w/Disabilities-Employment |
| Cause | 42:12111 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Case Filed: | Dec 18, 2025 |
| Last checked: Tuesday Jun 16, 2026 12:37 AM PDT |
|
Defendant
Asante
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
Keith Coddington
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 9 hours ago |
| Tuesday, August 18, 2026 | ||
| 31 | 31
Notice of Appearance . Olivia C. Munson,Olivia C. Munson for Asante. Filed by Asante. (Munson, Olivia) |
|
| Tuesday, August 04, 2026 | ||
| 30 | 30
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER: Granting Motion for a Protective Order29 . Signed on 08/04/2026 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm) |
|
| Monday, August 03, 2026 | ||
| 29 | 29
Stipulated Motion for Protective Order . Filed by Asante. (Ames Benedict, Sarah) |
|
| 28 | 28
oth_evt
Consent to Jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge
Mon 08/03 11:00 AM
Full Consent by all Parties to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to Standing Order 2025-2, the 30 days for any party wishing to decline the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge to file a declination of consent has passed and no declinations have been filed. The record confirms the consent of the parties and the case will remain assigned to the Magistrate Judge until conclusion. (rsm) |
|
| Thursday, June 11, 2026 | ||
| 27 | 27
order
Order
Thu 06/11 1:18 PM
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke: The parties have presented a discovery issue to the Court via informal letters. Plaintiff has produced certain requested discovery by printing the relevant e-mails and text messages and sending them to Defendant as flat PDF files, without any corresponding metadata. Defendant objects to the format of this discovery. The Court resolves the dispute as follows. When requesting production of Electronically Stored Information (ESI), a party may specify the form or forms in which electronically stored information is to be produced. FRCP 34(b)(1)(C). If a request does not specify a form for producing electronically stored information, a party must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms. FRCP 34(b)(2)(E). While the Plaintiff has objected to the financial burden that would be imposed by the Defendant's requested format of the ESI at issue here, there is no indication that simply producing the ESI in the native format, with basic metadata intact, would be overly burdensome. Additionally, this native format is how text message and e-mails are "ordinarily maintained," and therefore such a format is required by the rules. There is also no burdensome time constraint, as the time for discovery does not close for many months. Therefore, Plaintiff shall produce the relevant text messages, e-mails, and other communications, in their native format, with intact metadata, within a reasonable amount of time. (jk) |
|
| Monday, May 04, 2026 | ||
| 26 | 26
Notice of Implied Consent to Jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge and Declination of Consent Form. Parties who do not return the form by the deadline will be deemed to have knowingly and voluntarily consented to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Declination of Consent to Jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge, if any, is to be filed by 6/3/2026. (rsm) |
|
| 25 | 25
minute
Rule 16 Conference
Mon 05/04 12:42 PM
MINUTES of Proceedings: Telephonic Rule 16 Conference held. Discovery is to be completed by 1/29/2027. Amended Pleadings or join parties due by 09/01/2026. Liability Expert Disclosures due 02/26/2027. Rebuttal Liability Expert Disclosures due on 03/26/2027. Expert Discovery to be completed by 4/16/2027. Dispositive Motions are due by 5/17/2027. Please contact the Court prior to filing any Motions to Compel. Aaron Baker present as counsel for plaintiff(s). Dominik MacKinnon and Sara Benedict present as counsel for defendant(s). Court Reporter: Hearing was not recorded. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm) |
|
| 24 | 24
Rule 26(f) Report and Discovery Plan . Filed by Asante. (Ames Benedict, Sarah) |
|
| Friday, May 01, 2026 | ||
| 23 | 23
Notice of Implied Consent to Jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge and Declination of Consent Form. Parties who do not return the form by the deadline will be deemed to have knowingly and voluntarily consented to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Declination of Consent to Jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge, if any, is to be filed by 6/1/2026. (rsm) |
|
| Tuesday, April 21, 2026 | ||
| 22 | 22
order
1 - Scheduling
Tue 04/21 4:02 PM
SCHEDULING ORDER. RECORD OF ORDER by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke: RESETTING the telephonic Rule 16 Conference from 04/27/2026 at 9:00 AM to 05/04/2026 at 11:00 AM. Conference call information remains the same as previously provided. At the time of the Conference, parties should have their calendars available to discuss scheduling matters, including modification of the current case deadlines, joining additional parties and amending the pleadings, dispositive motions, and setting a trial date. The parties shall consult pursuant to FRCP 26(f) regarding a focused and proportional discovery plan prior to the Conference. A written report is not required. However, the parties should be prepared to briefly summarize the issues in the case and give the Court a realistic picture of what discovery needs to be completed. The ultimate goal of the discovery plan shall be "the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination" of the action. FRCP 1. If depositions are anticipated, the parties should confer prior to the Conference and have a firm date for the depositions scheduled prior to the conference. Parties shall confer prior to the Conference and consider whether the case could benefit from a streamlined approach, utilizing limited discovery and early dispositive motions, settlement conference, or an expedited trial date. Finally, if the parties intend to file written consents (these need to be filed separately on the docket by each party and not combined in a Joint Status Report) to a magistrate judge, it would be helpful to do so prior to the Rule 16 Conference, particularly if they want to secure a firm trial date. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm) |
|
| Friday, April 10, 2026 | ||
| 21 | 21
order
1 - Scheduling
Fri 04/10 4:23 PM
SCHEDULING ORDER . RECORD OF ORDER by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke: SETTING a telephonic Rule 16 Conference for April 27, 2026 at 9:00 AM. Conference call information will be provided in a separate entry. At the time of the Conference, parties should have their calendars available to discuss scheduling matters, including modification of the current case deadlines, joining additional parties and amending the pleadings, dispositive motions, and setting a trial date. The parties shall consult pursuant to FRCP 26(f) regarding a focused and proportional discovery plan prior to the Conference. A written report is not required. However, the parties should be prepared to briefly summarize the issues in the case and give the Court a realistic picture of what discovery needs to be completed. The ultimate goal of the discovery plan shall be "the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination" of the action. FRCP 1. If depositions are anticipated, the parties should confer prior to the Conference and have a firm date for the depositions scheduled prior to the conference. Parties shall confer prior to the Conference and consider whether the case could benefit from a streamlined approach, utilizing limited discovery and early dispositive motions, settlement conference, or an expedited trial date. Finally, if the parties intend to file written consents (these need to be filed separately on the docket by each party and not combined in a Joint Status Report) to a magistrate judge, it would be helpful to do so prior to the Rule 16 Conference, particularly if they want to secure a firm trial date. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm) |
|
| Thursday, April 09, 2026 | ||
| 20 | 20
Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Asante. (Ames Benedict, Sarah) |
|
| 19 | 19
Answer to1 Complaint, Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Filed by Asante. (Ames Benedict, Sarah) |
|
| Tuesday, April 07, 2026 | ||
| 18 | 18
order
Order on Motion for Stay
Tue 04/07 2:46 PM
ORDER: Finding as Moot Motion for Stay8 . Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm) |
|
| 17 | 17
order
Order on Motion to Withdraw
Tue 04/07 2:46 PM
ORDER: Granting Motion to Withdraw16 Motion to Stay. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm) |
|
| Monday, April 06, 2026 | ||
| 16 | 16
Motion to Withdraw Motion for Stay8 . Filed by Asante. (Mackinnon, Dominik) |
|
| Tuesday, March 24, 2026 | ||
| 15 | 15
order
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion
Tue 03/24 8:03 AM
ORDER: Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Response13 to Motion to Stay8 . Response is due by 4/6/2026. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm) |
|
| Monday, March 23, 2026 | ||
| 14 | 14
Declaration of Serena L. Liss . Filed by Keith Coddington. (Liss, Serena) |
|
| 13 | 13
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response/Reply to Motion for Stay 8 . Filed by Keith Coddington. (Liss, Serena) |
|
| Wednesday, March 11, 2026 | ||
| 12 | 12
order
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion
Wed 03/11 3:20 PM
ORDER: Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Response10 . Response is now due by 3/23/2026. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm) |
|
| Monday, March 09, 2026 | ||
| 11 | 11
Declaration of Serena L. Liss . Filed by Keith Coddington. (Liss, Serena) |
|
| 10 | 10
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response/Reply to Motion for Stay 8 . Filed by Keith Coddington. (Liss, Serena) |
|
| Monday, February 23, 2026 | ||
| 9 | 9
Declaration of Mackinnon . Filed by Asante. (Mackinnon, Dominik) |
|
|
Att: 1
|
||
|
Att: 2
|
||
|
Att: 3
|
||
|
Att: 4
|
||
|
Att: 5
|
||
|
Att: 6
|
||
| 8 | 8
Motion for Stay . Filed by Asante. (Mackinnon, Dominik) |
|
| Wednesday, January 21, 2026 | ||
| 7 | 7
order
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer a Complaint/Petition
Wed 01/21 8:55 AM
ORDER: Granting Motion for Extension of Time to Answer6 . Answer is due by 2/23/2026. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm) |
|
| Friday, January 16, 2026 | ||
| 6 | 6
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint,1 . Filed by Asante. (Ames Benedict, Sarah) |
|
| Wednesday, January 14, 2026 | ||
| 5 | 5
Affidavit of Service of Summons Issued,4 upon Asante served on 1/2/2026, answer due on 1/23/2026 Filed by Keith Coddington. (Liss, Serena) |
|
| Friday, December 19, 2025 | ||
| 4 | 4
Summons Issued Electronically as to Asante. NOTICE: The filing party shall print and serve the summonses and all other documents issued by the Clerk at the time of case initiation upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5(c). (hm) |
|
| 3 | 3
order
1 - Scheduling
Fri 12/19 11:21 AM
SCHEDULING ORDER regarding Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order,,2 . Dispositive Motions are due by 5/18/2026. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (hm) |
|
| 2 | 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: The filing party shall print and serve this Order, the summonses, and all other documents issued by the Clerk at case initiation upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5(c) . Discovery is to be completed by 4/20/2026. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 5/18/2026. Pretrial Order is due by 5/18/2026. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (hm) |
|
| Thursday, December 18, 2025 | ||
| 1 | 1
Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $405 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-10103541 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Keith Coddington against All Defendants. (Taylor, Cameron) |
|
|
Att: 1
|
||
|
Att: 2
|
||