Lucido v. Nestle Purina Pet Care Company
California Northern District Court | |
Judge: | Edward M Chen |
Referred: | Joseph C Spero |
Case #: | 3:15-cv-00569 |
Nature of Suit | 385 Torts - Personal Property - Property Damage Product Liability |
Cause | 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Case Filed: | Feb 05, 2015 |
Terminated: | Nov 17, 2016 |
Last checked: Tuesday Aug 04, 2015 7:18 AM PDT |
Defendant
Nestle Purina Pet Care Company
a Missouri corporation 1 Checkerboard Square
St. Louis, MO 63164 |
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Wayne Colello
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Frank Lucido
San Francisco, CA 94111
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Jennifer Hickey
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Pat Kelly
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Kacy Kimball
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Sharon Normand
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Thomas Normand
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
America Pena
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Karen Phillips
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Diane Porter
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Elizabeth Rodarte
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Reggie Smith
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Christina Winters
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Cynthia Xenakis
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Richard Carter
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Lance Carlson
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Laurae Campbell
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Almaceo Campbell
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Virginia Burgardt
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Robert Bryden
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Regina Bollinger
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Ricky Bisharat
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Robin Benham
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Hope Benham
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
David Balmer
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Karen Baker
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Grace Armstrong
|
Represented By
|
1. | Lawsuit claims Purina brand is killing dogs (usatoday.com) |
Submitted Wed 02/25/2015 | |
Docket last updated: 11 hours ago |
Wednesday, November 23, 2016 | ||
224 | 224
![]() ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen granting 223 STIPULATION RE CONTINUATION OFDEADLINES PURSUANT TO FED. R.CIV. PROC. 54 AND L-R 7-8 AND 54-1. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2016) |
|
Tuesday, November 22, 2016 | ||
223 | 223
![]() STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re222 Judgment re Continuation of Deadlines Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 54 and L-R 7-8 and 54-1 filed by Nestle Purina Pet Care Company. (Weiss, Andrea) (Filed on 11/22/2016) |
|
Thursday, November 17, 2016 | ||
222 | 222
![]() JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/17/2016. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2016) |
|
221 | 221
![]() ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen (1) Granting 114 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; (2) Granting in Part and Denying in Part 110 124 Defendant's Motions to Exclude the Expert Report, Opinions, and Testimony of Dr. Questen and Dr. Tegzes; and (3) Denying 215 217 219 Plaintiffs' Motion to Supplement the Record and Motion to Shorten Time. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2016) |