Bolden v. City Of Chicago et al
| Illinois Northern District Court | |
| Judge: | Milton I Shadur |
| Case #: | 1:17-cv-00417 |
| Nature of Suit | 440 Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights |
| Cause | 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Case Filed: | Jan 19, 2017 |
| Last checked: Tuesday Jul 18, 2017 4:11 AM CDT |
|
Defendant
As-Yet Unknown Current or Former Employees of the City of Chicago
|
|
|
Defendant
Michael Baker
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
City Of Chicago
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Edward Hicks
|
|
|
Defendant
Michael Kill
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
James Oliver
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Angelo Pesavento
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Edward Siwek
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Barbara Temple
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Joseph Barnes
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Michael Rowan
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
Eddie L. Bolden
|
Represented By
|
| TERMINATED PARTIES | |
|
Defendant
George Karl
Terminated: 03/14/2017
|
|
|
Defendant
William Higgins
Terminated: 04/19/2017
|
|
|
Defendant
Personal Representative of the Estate of George Karl
Terminated: 04/19/2017
|
|
GPO
Mar 15 2017
MEMORANDUM Order Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 3/15/2017:Mailed notice(jms, ) |
|
|
GPO
May 19 2017
MOTION by Defendant City Of Chicago for judgment - Motion for Entry of Guaranty of Satisfaction of Judgment (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A)(Shpigel, Elan) |
|
|
GPO
Aug 02 2017
the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 8/2/2017:Mailed notice(clw, ) MEMORANDUM Order: For the reasons stated in this memorandum order, codefendant City of Chicago's Motion To Bifurcate Plaintiff's Monell Claims" (Dkt. No. 95), later joined in by other defendants in Dkt. No. 99 are denied. Signed by |
|
|
GPO
Dec 12 2017
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 12/12/2017: The defendant officers' motion to dismiss 57 is granted in part and denied in part. Count I is dismissed as to the Brady claim for destruction of the 911 call recording and as to the separate due process claim for failure to investigate. Count VI is dismissed to the extent it is based on the Fourteenth Amendment. The City of Chicago's motion to dismiss 61 is denied. [For further detail see attached order.] Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
|
|
GPO
Aug 09 2019
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 8/9/19.Mailed notice(ca, ) |
|
|
GPO
Aug 25 2022
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 8/25/2022. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
|
|
GPO
Oct 28 2022
MOTION by Defendants George Karl, James Oliver, Angelo Pesavento, Edward J. Siwek for judgment Defendants' Joint Rule 50(b) Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Stefanich, Brian) |