FIH, LLC v. Foundation Capital Partners, LLC et al
| Connecticut District Court | |
| Judge: | Janet Bond Arterton |
| Referred: | Joan G Margolis |
| Case #: | 3:15-cv-00785 |
| Nature of Suit | 850 Other Statutes - Securities/Commodities/Exchange |
| Cause | 28:1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation |
| Case Filed: | May 22, 2015 |
| Re-opened: | Apr 23, 2019 |
| Terminated: | Jan 09, 2020 |
| Last checked: Wednesday Nov 18, 2015 9:06 AM EST |
|
Defendant
Dean Barr
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Joseph Elmlinger
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Foundation Capital Partners LLC
|
|
|
Defendant
Joseph Meehan
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
Thomas Ward
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
FIH, LLC
|
Represented By
|
GPO
Mar 30 2016
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 46 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 47 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 49 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 51 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 3/30/16. (Harris, J) |
|
|
GPO
Apr 26 2016
ORDER granting 65 Motion for Reconsideration ; granting 66 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 4/26/16. (Harris, J) |
|
|
GPO
May 18 2016
ENDORSEMENT ORDER Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 5/18/16.(Harris, J) |
|
|
GPO
Jul 28 2016
RULING denying in large part (Dkt. #118) Defendants' Motion to Continue to the extent that it seeks to cancel the August 4-5, 2016 PJR Hearing, and granting Defendants' Motion to Continue in limited part to the extent that continued hearing dates may be scheduled in late October; and denying in part (Dkt. #121) Plaintiff's Emergency Motion for Protective Order to the extent that it seeks to postpone the August 1-2, 2016 depositions, but granting Plaintiff's Emergency Motione the requested limitations in appropriate motions to be filed with the Court during the remaining discovery period. (See Attached). Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 7/28/2016. (Watson, M.) for Protective Order to the extent that the subject matter of the depositions is limited to any issues that will be raised at the PJR hearing; counsel will not be hampered by any of the conditions demanded by any of the parties, and counsel may rais |
|
|
GPO
Jan 31 2018
f's state-law claims are dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 1/31/2018. (Kolker, J.)ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, Plaintiff's Motion 174 for Summary Judgment is DENIED, and Defendants' Motions 173 176 178 179 for Summary Judgment are GRANTED as to Plaintiff's federal claim. Plaintif |
|
|
GPO
Oct 22 2019
ORDER addressing Parties' memoranda of law 223 224 and adhering to prior dismissal 210 of Plaintiff's state law claims. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 10/22/19. (Gutierrez, A.) |
| 1. | For Foundation Capital, Deals Proved Elusive (wsj.com) |
| Submitted Thu 02/18/2016 | |